Modeling apical and basal tree contribution to orientation selectivity in a mouse primary visual cortex layer 2/3 pyramidal cell

  1. Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis
  2. Ji Young Park
  3. Athanasia Papoutsi
  4. Stelios Smirnakis  Is a corresponding author
  5. Panayiota Poirazi  Is a corresponding author
  1. FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Greece
  2. Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States

Abstract

Pyramidal neurons, a mainstay of cortical regions, receive a plethora of inputs from various areas onto their morphologically distinct apical and basal trees. Both trees differentially contribute to the somatic response, defining distinct anatomical and possibly functional sub-units. To elucidate the contribution of each tree to the encoding of visual stimuli at the somatic level, we modeled the response pattern of a mouse L2/3 V1 pyramidal neuron to orientation tuned synaptic input. Towards this goal, we used a morphologically detailed computational model of a single cell that replicates electrophysiological and two-photon imaging data. Our simulations predict a synergistic effect of apical and basal trees on somatic action potential generation: basal tree activity, in the form of either depolarization or dendritic spiking, is necessary for producing somatic activity, despite the fact that most somatic spikes are heavily driven by apical dendritic spikes. This model provides evidence for synergistic computations taking place in the basal and apical trees of the L2/3 V1 neuron along with mechanistic explanations for tree-specific contributions and emphasizes the potential role of predictive and attentional feedback input in these cells.

Data availability

The code and all data used/generated in the manuscript will be publicly available in a GitHub repository https://github.com/kepetousakis/petousakis_etal_2023.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis

    FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2022-1671
  2. Ji Young Park

    Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Athanasia Papoutsi

    FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2466-7259
  4. Stelios Smirnakis

    Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    smsmirnakis@bwh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1929-2811
  5. Panayiota Poirazi

    FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece
    For correspondence
    poirazi@imbb.forth.gr
    Competing interests
    Panayiota Poirazi, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6152-595X

Funding

ERC Starting Grant dEMORY (GA 311435)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

H2020-MSCA ITN 2019, SmartNets (GA 860949)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

Fondation Santé a FORTH-Synergy Grant (EVO-NMDA)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

H2020-FETOPEN-2018-2019-2020-01NEUREKA (GA 863245)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

NIH NEI (R01 grant EY-024019)

  • Stelios Smirnakis

NINDS (R21 grant NS088457)

  • Stelios Smirnakis

Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (PhD Scholarship (no. 6731))

  • Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis

FORTH-Synergy Grant (FlexBe)

  • Athanasia Papoutsi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Timothy E Behrens, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: August 8, 2023
  2. Accepted: November 12, 2023
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 6, 2023 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2023, Petousakis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 54
    Page views
  • 16
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis
  2. Ji Young Park
  3. Athanasia Papoutsi
  4. Stelios Smirnakis
  5. Panayiota Poirazi
(2023)
Modeling apical and basal tree contribution to orientation selectivity in a mouse primary visual cortex layer 2/3 pyramidal cell
eLife 12:e91627.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91627

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Connon I Thomas, Melissa A Ryan ... Benjamin Scholl
    Research Article

    Postsynaptic mitochondria are critical for the development, plasticity, and maintenance of synaptic inputs. However, their relationship to synaptic structure and functional activity is unknown. We examined a correlative dataset from ferret visual cortex with in vivo two-photon calcium imaging of dendritic spines during visual stimulation and electron microscopy reconstructions of spine ultrastructure, investigating mitochondrial abundance near functionally and structurally characterized spines. Surprisingly, we found no correlation to structural measures of synaptic strength. Instead, we found that mitochondria are positioned near spines with orientation preferences that are dissimilar to the somatic preference. Additionally, we found that mitochondria are positioned near groups of spines with heterogeneous orientation preferences. For a subset of spines with a mitochondrion in the head or neck, synapses were larger and exhibited greater selectivity to visual stimuli than those without a mitochondrion. Our data suggest mitochondria are not necessarily positioned to support the energy needs of strong spines, but rather support the structurally and functionally diverse inputs innervating the basal dendrites of cortical neurons.

    1. Neuroscience
    Weiwei Qui, Chelsea R Hutch ... Darleen Sandoval
    Research Article

    Several discrete groups of feeding-regulated neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (nucleus tractus solitarius; NTS) suppress food intake, including avoidance-promoting neurons that express Cck (NTSCck cells) and distinct Lepr- and Calcr-expressing neurons (NTSLepr and NTSCalcr cells, respectively) that suppress food intake without promoting avoidance. To test potential synergies among these cell groups we manipulated multiple NTS cell populations simultaneously. We found that activating multiple sets of NTS neurons (e.g., NTSLepr plus NTSCalcr (NTSLC), or NTSLC plus NTSCck (NTSLCK)) suppressed feeding more robustly than activating single populations. While activating groups of cells that include NTSCck neurons promoted conditioned taste avoidance (CTA), NTSLC activation produced no CTA despite abrogating feeding. Thus, the ability to promote CTA formation represents a dominant effect but activating multiple non-aversive populations augments the suppression of food intake without provoking avoidance. Furthermore, silencing multiple NTS neuron groups augmented food intake and body weight to a greater extent than silencing single populations, consistent with the notion that each of these NTS neuron populations plays crucial and cumulative roles in the control of energy balance. We found that silencing NTSLCK neurons failed to blunt the weight-loss response to vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and that feeding activated many non-NTSLCK neurons, however, suggesting that as-yet undefined NTS cell types must make additional contributions to the restraint of feeding.