Differential regulation of hair cell actin cytoskeleton mediated by SRF and MRTFB
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, United States
Abstract
The MRTF–SRF pathway has been extensively studied for its crucial role in driving the expression of a large number of genes involved in actin cytoskeleton of various cell types. However, the specific contribution of MRTF–SRF in hair cells remains unknown. In this study, we showed that hair cell-specific deletion of Srf or Mrtfb, but not Mrtfa, leads to similar defects in the development of stereocilia dimensions and the maintenance of cuticular plate integrity. We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based hair cell RNA-Seq analysis to investigate the mechanistic underpinnings of the changes observed in Srf and Mrtfb mutants, respectively. Interestingly, the transcriptome analysis revealed distinct profiles of genes regulated by Srf and Mrtfb, suggesting different transcriptional regulation mechanisms of actin cytoskeleton activities mediated by Srf and Mrtfb. Exogenous delivery of calponin 2 using Adeno-associated virus transduction in Srf mutants partially rescued the impairments of stereocilia dimensions and the F-actin intensity of cuticular plate, suggesting the involvement of Cnn2, as an Srf downstream target, in regulating the hair bundle morphology and cuticular plate actin cytoskeleton organization. Our study uncovers, for the first time, the unexpected differential transcriptional regulation of actin cytoskeleton mediated by Srf and Mrtfb in hair cells, and also demonstrates the critical role of SRF–CNN2 in modulating actin dynamics of the stereocilia and cuticular plate, providing new insights into the molecular mechanism underlying hair cell development and maintenance.
Editor's evaluation
This important study provides convincing evidence implicating two transcription factors in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton that shapes the mechanosensory hair bundles of the inner ear's hair cells. Although the mechanistic understanding of their operation remains incomplete, the work will be of interest to biologists interested in the development and maintenance of the hair bundle.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90155.sa0Introduction
The actin cytoskeleton constitutes the structural basis of all features required for hair cell mechanoreceptor function, including the hair bundle and the cuticular plate (Drummond et al., 2012; Furness et al., 2005; Tilney et al., 1989). Actin-based stereocilia form rows of staircase-like structures with precise control of length and diameter on the apical surface of hair cells (Tilney et al., 1992; Kaltenbach et al., 1994; Krey et al., 2020). Proper development of stereocilia dimensions determines the mechanical response of hair bundles to sound stimuli or head motions. The cuticular plate consists of a dense network of actin filaments crosslinked by actin-binding proteins (DeRosier and Tilney, 1989; Mahendrasingam et al., 1998; Pollock and McDermott, 2015), providing a mechanical foundation and rigidity for the stereocilia (Furness et al., 2008; Self et al., 1998). Disruption of the F-actin mesh integrity of cuticular plate results in hearing impairments (Du et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019). Understanding how the hair cell governs its actin cytoskeleton is thus critical for understanding the development, function, and maintenance of the hair bundle and the cuticular plate. Substantial emerging evidence has revealed many genes indispensable for stereocilia elongation and widening, including actin crosslinkers, capping proteins, and myosins. Similarly, the complex cytoskeletal structure of cuticular plate is regulated by actins and actin crosslinkers. However, the general molecular mechanism of transcriptional regulation of actin cytoskeletal dynamics in stereocilia and cuticular plate remains poorly understood.
Serum response factor (SRF) is a highly conserved and ubiquitously expressed transcription factor that belongs to the MADS-box protein family. SRF activates the expression of target genes mainly through two disparate cofactors, TCFs (ternary complex factors) and MRTFs (myocardin-related transcription factors). These two families of cofactors compete for a common binding site of SRF, enabling Srf to direct the expression of different sets of target genes. Srf directly regulates immediate early genes mostly associated with cell proliferation, signaling, and transcription in coordination with TCFs (Shaw et al., 1989). Three MRTFs, including the cardiovascular system-specific expressed member Myocardin, and widely expressed MRTFA and MRTFB, are known to interact with SRF. The MRTF–SRF pathway has been extensively studied genetically in many systems, and it drives a large number of genes involved in actin cytoskeletal activities, contractility, and muscle differentiation (Olson and Nordheim, 2010; Posern and Treisman, 2006; Wang et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2004). Phenotypically, inactivation of Srf or Mrtfs often exhibits similar impairments. Conditional brain Mrtfa/b double-knockout mice show abnormalities in neuronal migration and neurite outgrowth that recapitulated the defects reported for brain-specific deletion of Srf (Alberti et al., 2005; Knöll et al., 2006). Podocyte-specific loss of both Mrtfs mimics the Srf deficiency phenotype in the maintenance of podocyte structure and function (Guo et al., 2018). During hematopoietic development, inactivation of either Srf or both Mrtfs in HSC progenitor cells leads to defects in their colonization of the bone marrow (Costello et al., 2015). However, there is also evidence showing that MRTFs can act as cofactor of transcriptional factors other than SRF and impact on the expression of genes involved in actin cytoskeletal activity, such as cell motility (Kim et al., 2017; Liao et al., 2014; Xing et al., 2015).
Some well-known proteins encoded by MRTF–SRF target genes related to actin cytoskeleton in other cell types are essential for hair cell actin-based cytoskeleton structure. For example, structure components of F-actin, ACTB, and ACTG1, are required for stereocilia maintenance (Belyantseva et al., 2009; Perrin et al., 2013; Perrin et al., 2010). F-actin severing protein CFL1 functions in stereocilia dimensions (McGrath et al., 2021), and actin-binding protein gelsolin is crucial for maintaining the cohesion of the hair bundle structure (Olt et al., 2014). However, it is unclear whether MRTF–SRF-mediated transcriptional regulation is required for hair cell actin-based cytoskeleton structure and function.
Our results demonstrate that in hair cells, both Srf and Mrtfb, but not Mrtfa, are necessary for the development and maintenance of actin-based cytoskeleton structures, such as the hair bundle and the cuticular plate. The specific deletion of Srf in hair cells resulted in a significant reduction in stereocilia length and diameter, as well as a decrease in F-actin intensity in the cuticular plate. In the absence of Mrtfb, we observed alterations in stereocilia dimensions and a loss of cuticular plate integrity, which are similar but less severe than those observed in Srf mutants. Furthermore, Mrtfb cKO mice developed early-onset hearing loss, in addition to the impairments in the hair bundle and cuticular plate. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis revealed distinct molecular consequences of Srf or Mrtfb deficiency in hair cell transcriptome, indicating that Mtrfb may function in an Srf-independent manner. Finally, we identified the actin-binding protein CNN2 as a downstream effector of Srf that is involved in regulating stereocilia dimensions and the organization of the F-actin network in the cuticular plate. These findings highlight the critical role of Srf and Mrtfb in the development and maintenance of hair cells, and shed light on the molecular mechanisms underlying actin cytoskeleton regulation in these cells.
Results
Srf cKO mice have defects in the cuticular plate
As previously described, deficiency of the transcription factor Srf (Srf −/−) causes embryonic lethality due to severe gastrulation defects (Arsenian et al., 1998). To circumvent this limitation, we utilized mice expressing the recombinase Cre under the control of Atoh1 promoter, permitting deletion of floxed Srf in hair cells. Offspring with the Srf fl/fl; Atoh1Cre genotype (hereafter referred to as Srf cKO) was born at normal mendelian ratios, but displayed reduced body weight and a relatively weak appearance, and mostly died in the third postnatal week (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A, B), potentially due to Atoh1-Cre recombinase activity in the intestine and the brain (Shroyer et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2010; Alberti et al., 2005). However, gross morphology of the inner ear was not significantly affected (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). Immunocytochemistry confirmed that SRF was detectable in all cell types of the organ of Corti at E16 (data not shown). To validate hair cell-specific knockout of Srf, we confirmed that SRF protein expression became undetectable at P0 in hair cells but not in supporting cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D). We further confirmed that Srf mRNA level in hair cells isolated from Srf cKO pups was significantly reduced compared to control hair cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1E).
Upon closer inspection, we found that the cuticular plate of inner hair cells (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs) from Srf cKO mice displayed a significant reduction in the amount of F-actin as indicated by phalloidin staining (Figure 1A, B). LMO7, an actin-binding protein important for F-actin network organization (Du et al., 2019), displayed a more punctate distribution in the cuticular plate (Figure 1C). We also examined the rootlets, which are composed of tightly packed actin filaments and form the stereocilia insertion sites into the cuticular plate. The rootlets are wrapped with TRIOBP, an actin-bundling protein that is an essential component of the rootlets (Kitajiri et al., 2010). Although the spatial organization of the rootlets appeared normal, the length of TRIOBP-positive rootlets was significantly reduced in Srf cKO mice, along with the intensity of TRIOBP staining (Figure 1D, E). Interestingly, the deficit in the integrity of the cuticular plate F-actin mesh accompanied by shortened rootlets also appeared in Lmo7-deficient mice as described in a previous study (Du et al., 2019). This similarity suggests that F-actin network in the cuticular plate is critical for the proper formation of the rootlets, although the causal connection between them remains unknown. To further investigate the F-actin meshwork abnormalities in the cuticular plate, we quantified the volume of the phalloidin-labeled cuticular plates after 3D reconstruction using Imaris software and also conducted an ultrastructural analysis using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results of the cuticular plate volume (CP volume) (Figure 1F, G) were consistent with the relative F-actin fluorescence intensity change of the cuticular plate (Figure 1A, B). The TEM results demonstrated that the cuticular plates in Srf cKO mice were markedly thinner compared to control in IHCs at P10 (Figure 1H). Although TEM images did not indicate an obvious reduction in the thickness of F-actin meshwork in P10 Srf cKO OHCs, the vesicle-like structures were often seen in the cuticular plate of the mutants (Figure 1I). The significant reduction of F-actin intensity indicating by phalloidin staining in Srf cKO OHCs (Figure 1B) may partially be caused by the vesicle-like structures occupation in the cuticular plate. The deformation of the overlying plasma membrane above the cuticular plate of OHCs were also revealed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in mutants (Figure 2F, as indicated by arrows).
Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all
Srf cKO mice have defects in the cuticular plate.
(A) Reduced phalloidin staining in the cuticular plates of Srf cKO hair cells (HCs) at P10. (B) Quantification of phalloidin reactivity in the cuticular plates of HCs in control and Srf cKO mice at P10. The relative intensity changes are the ratio of phalloidin intensity of mutant and control cuticular plates. Analyzed numbers (cells, animals): inner hair cells (IHCs), control (68, 6), Srf cKO (67, 6). Outer hair cells (OHCs), control (240, 6), Srf cKO (269, 6). (C) LMO7 immunostaining in HCs of control and Srf cKO at P10. (D) TRIOBP immunostaining in IHCs of control and Srf cKO at P10. Side views of TRIOBP labeling in IHCs are on the right. (E) Quantification of rootlet length of the longest row of IHC stereocilia (as shown by arrows in D) in control and Srf cKO at P10. Analyzed numbers (stereocilia, cells, animals): control (50, 14, 4), Srf cKO (41, 12, 4). (F) Imaris 3D reconstruction of phalloidin-labeled cuticular plates in control and Srf cKO mice at P10. The contour of the cuticular plate outlined by a yellow line in Srf cKO represents the area used to calculate the volume of the cuticular plate. (G) Quantification of cuticular plate volume of control and Srf cKO IHCs. Analyzed numbers (cells, animals): control (20, 5), Srf cKO (22, 5). (H, I) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of cuticular plates of IHCs and OHCs in control and Srf cKO at P10. In D, scale bar for the side-view represents 1 μm. In H and I, the scale bars represent 1 μm. Scale bars in other panels represent 5 μm. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), p values were derived from two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, ****p-value <0.0001, **p-value <0.01.
Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
The defects of stereocilia dimensions in Srf cKO mice.
(A) Phalloidin-stained inner hair cell (IHC) bundles of control and Srf cKO at different ages. En face views (scale bar, 5 μm) are on the left, and side views (scale bar, 1 μm) are on the right. (B) Fluorescence-based quantification of the length of row 1 IHC stereocilia at different cochlear positions, at P5 and P10. Analyzed numbers (stereocilia, cells, animals): middle IHCs, P5 control (60, 30, 5), P5 Srf cKO (62, 30, 5), P10 control (61, 25, 6), P10 Srf cKO (62, 26, 6). Basal IHCs, P5 control (41, 21, 5), P5 Srf cKO (53, 24, 5), P10 control (74, 28, 6), P10 Srf cKO (153, 53, 6). (C, D) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of outer hair cells (OHCs) and IHCs in control and Srf cKO mice at P10. (E) SEM-based quantification of row 1 stereocilia length and width in basal HCs at P10. Analyzed numbers: lengths: IHCs, control (42, 20, 5), Srf cKO (52, 18, 5). OHCs, control (149, 43, 5), Srf cKO (165, 42, 5). Widths: IHCs, control (88, 22, 5), Srf cKO (81, 20, 5). OHCs, control (164, 45, 5), Srf cKO (147, 42, 5). (F, G) SEM of OHCs and IHCs in control and Srf cKO mice at P15. (H) SEM-based quantification of rows 1 and 2 stereocilia width in basal IHCs at P15. Analyzed numbers: row 1, control (76, 11, 3), Srf cKO (150, 15, 3). Row 2, control (85, 11, 3), Srf cKO (134, 14, 3). Scale bars in C, D, F and G represent 5 μm. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), p values were derived from two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, ****p value<0.0001.
Srf is required for the development and maintenance of stereocilia dimensions
We conducted a systematic examination of hair bundle morphology using immunocytochemistry and SEM at different developmental stages to assess the effects of Srf deficiency. We used phalloidin staining to visualize actin core of stereocilia and measured the length of stereocilia. At P5, the staircase-like architecture of Srf cKO hair bundles developed well, but the length of row 1 (the longest row) IHC stereocilia was slightly reduced, which worsened by P10 (Figure 2A, B and Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). SEM further revealed that the length of row 1 IHC, the length of row 1 OHC, and the width of row 1 IHC stereocilia were significantly reduced in mutants at P10, but no statistical difference was found for the width of row 1 OHC stereocilia yet (Figure 2C–E). In rare cases, a few cochleae of Srf cKO mice survived past 2 weeks and were harvested at P15 and P24. Immunocytochemistry showed that the length and width of row 1 IHC stereocilia were obviously reduced in mutants at P15 and P24, as well as the width of stereocilia in utricles (Figure 2A and Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). Statistical analysis of SEM images confirmed that the width of rows 1 and 2 IHC stereocilia was drastically reduced by 40% in Srf cKO at P15 (Figure 2G, H).
The loss of Srf also affected the regression of microvilli at the medial side of the hair bundle. During early hair bundle development, a subset of microvilli on the apical surface of the hair cell differentiate into stereocilia while the rest regress (Tilney et al., 1992). At P15, numerous microvilli still persisted in Srf cKO IHCs, indicating a lack of mature hair bundle characteristics, but this was not the case for Srf cKO OHCs (Figure 2F, G). The kinocilium, a microtubule-based cilium that is essential for the polarity of the developing hair bundle, degenerates in mouse cochlear hair cells from base to apex at P8 and disappears completely around P12 (Haag et al., 2018; Leibovici et al., 2005). Confocal microscopy images showed that more kinocilia remained in Srf cKO IHCs compared to the controls at P10 (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C, D). Presumably, this also indicates that Srf cKO hair cells were developmentally less mature, although the physiological significance of kinocilia degeneration is still unclear. We conclude that SRF is required for the development as well as the maintenance of the F-actin-enriched hair bundle and the cuticular plate.
Altered expression pattern of proteins required for stereocilia dimensions in Srf cKO
Given that the stereocilia dimensions were affected in Srf cKO hair bundle, we quantified the localization of several key proteins known to be critical for hair bundle development. ESPN1, an isoform of ESPN, which is an actin-binding and bundling protein, is required for the elongation of hair cell stereocilia (Ebrahim et al., 2016; Rzadzinska et al., 2005; Salles et al., 2009). Similarly, EPS8 and GNAI3, which are components of the row 1 complex, are essential for controlling the elongation of the tallest row of stereocilia during hair bundle morphological development (Tarchini et al., 2016; Zampini et al., 2011). Using immunofluorescence, we quantified the tip signal of these proteins in row 1 stereocilia at P4 and P10. The dramatic decreases of the relative row 1 tip fluorescence signal intensity for ESPN1 and EPS8, but not GNAI3, started since P4 in Srf cKO IHCs. The decrease of GNAI3 in Srf cKO IHCs was observed soon after at P10 (Figure 3A–F). In addition to the reduced row 1 tip localization of ESPN1, EPS8, and GNAI3, the irregular labeling in different stereocilia of the same row were also observed in these tested proteins in Srf cKO mice (Figure 3G–I). Meanwhile, the row 2 tip signals of ESPN1, EPS8, and GNAI3 were partially maintained in Srf cKO IHCs compared to controls, although the expression of EPS8 and GNAI3 were abundant in row 1 tip and absent in row 2 tip in controls at P10 (Figure 3J–L). These data suggested that, initially, all the tested proteins responsible for stereocilia elongation were not efficiently targeting to row 1 stereocilia tips in Srf cKO mice. During stereocilia development, the distribution of EPS8 and GNAI3 between rows 1 and 2 stereocilia were also affected. We also quantified the relative fluorescence signals of FSCN2, an abundantly expressed actin-crosslinking protein in stereocilia (Perrin et al., 2013), within the stereocilia shaft. The fluorescence levels were significantly reduced by 20% in Srf cKO IHCs at P10 (Figure 3M, N). In summary, Srf deficiency in hair cells compromises the integrity of F-actin mesh in the cuticular plate and reduces the dimensions of stereocilia.
Figure 3
Altered distribution of tip proteins and actin crosslinker in Srf cKO mice.
(A–C) Immunofluorescence localization of ESPN1, EPS8, and GNAI3 in inner hair cells (IHCs) of control and Srf cKO at P4 and P10. Arrows indicate proteins staining on row 2 tips. Left panels are proteins staining separately from the phalloidin (in grayscale). (D–F) Quantitation of immunoreactivity of ESPN1, EPS8, and GNAI3 on IHCs stereocilia tips of control and Srf cKO, at P4 and P10. Analyzed numbers (stereocilia, cells, animals): ESPN1, P4 control (120, 12, 4), P4 Srf cKO (120, 12, 4), P10 control (180, 18, 5), P10 Srf cKO (170, 17, 5). EPS8, P4 control (120, 12, 5), P4 Srf cKO (110, 11, 5), P10 control (170, 17, 5), P10 Srf cKO (200, 20, 5). GNAI3, P4 control (120, 12, 4), P4 Srf cKO (110, 12, 4), P10 control (190, 19, 5), P10 Srf cKO (180, 18, 5). (G–I) Percentage of row 1 tip with ESPN1, EPS8, or GNAI3 staining to all row 1 stereocilia in IHCs of control and Srf cKO at P10. (J–L) Percentage of IHCs with ESPN1, EPS8, or GNAI3 staining on row 2 tips of control and Srf cKO at P10. Analyzed numbers in G–L (cells, animals): ESPN1, control (23, 5), Srf cKO (19, 5). EPS8, control (19, 5), Srf cKO (21, 5). GNAI3, control (25, 5), Srf cKO (21, 5). (M) FSCN2 immunostaining in control and Srf cKO IHCs. (N) Quantification of FSCN2 reactivity in IHC stereocilium shafts at P10. Analyzed numbers: control (110, 11, 5), Srf cKO (100, 10, 5). Scale bars, 5 μm. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), p values were derived from two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, ****p-value <0.0001, ***p-value <0.001, **p-value <0.01, and *p-value <0.05.
Mrtfb, but not Mrtfa is essential for the integrity of the cuticular plate and the development of stereocilia dimensions
Previous studies have identified Mrtfa and Mrtfb, the members of MRTF family, as having low levels of transcripts during inner ear development (Cai et al., 2015; Elkon et al., 2015; Scheffer et al., 2015). In the present study, we employed RNAscope staining to confirm the ubiquitous expression of Mrtfa and Mrtfb in E16 cochlea, including in hair cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A and Figure 4—figure supplement 2A). Based on the abnormality of hair cell actin cytoskeleton in Srf mutants, we aimed to investigate if Mrtfa or Mrtfb acts as a cofactor of Srf to regulate actin cytoskeleton genes involved in the development of cuticular plate and stereocilia. To achieve hair cell-specific deletion of Mrtfa or Mrtfb, we generated mice carrying floxed alleles of Mrtfa and Mrtfb, respectively (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B and Figure 4—figure supplement 2B), using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Crossing these mice to Atoh1-Cre line resulted in the production of Mrtfa cKO and Mrtfb cKO mice, which were viable and fertile with no overt phenotype. Mrtfa mRNA and protein levels, as well as MRTFB protein immunoreactivity, were partially reduced in hair cells of respective knockout mice (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C, D and Figure 4—figure supplement 2C, D). We measured the intensity of F-actin in the cuticular plate and the length of row 1 IHC stereocilia in Mrtfa mutants and observed no significant changes compared to controls at P26 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1E–G). Additionally, auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) measurements and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) recordings indicated normal hearing of Mrtfa cKO mice at P26 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1H).
In contrast to the Mrtfa cKO mice, Mrtfb cKO mice exhibited significant changes in the integrity of the cuticular plate and the dimensions of stereocilia. Specifically, a notable decrease in F-actin intensity was observed in the cuticular plate of Mrtfb cKO OHCs, with a trend toward reduced F-actin intensity noted in the cuticular plate of Mrtfb cKO IHCs (Figure 4A, B). Additionally, the length of TRIOBP-positive rootlets was reduced in the mutants, despite no observed changes in TRIOBP staining intensity (Figure 4C, D). The results of the CP volume in the control and Mrtfb cKO mice (Figure 4E, F) were consistent with the relative F-actin fluorescence intensity change of the cuticular plate (Figure 4A, B). Using TEM analysis, the results demonstrated that the cuticular plates in Mrtfb cKO mice were markedly thinner compared to control in OHCs at P10. The vesicle-like structures occupation in the cuticular plate were also observed in the mutants. The reduction of the cuticular plate thickness in Mrtfb cKO mice was more pronounced at P26. For IHCs, a decrease of the cuticular plate thickness in Mrtfb cKO was observed until P26 (Figure 4G, H). Immunocytochemistry was then used to examine hair bundle morphology at various developmental stages, from early postnatal to adult mice. At P5, no difference in row 1 IHC stereocilia length was observed between the control and Mrtfb cKO mice. However, the length of row 1 IHC stereocilia was significantly reduced at P10 and P26 (Figure 5A, B). While the staircase-like architecture of Mrtfb cKO OHC hair bundles formed adequately at P10, they progressively degenerated throughout development (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A). This reduction in stereocilia length and width was further confirmed through scanning electron microscope analysis of stereocilia morphologies at P10 and P42 (Figure 5C–H). Specifically, a slight reduction in stereocilia width was observed in OHCs, with the length of stereocilia remaining intact in mutants at P10 (Figure 5C, E). However, by P42, the stereocilia of OHCs had severely degenerated (Figure 5F). For IHCs, both the length and width of row 1 stereocilia showed significant decreases in Mrtfb mutants at P10 (Figure 5D, E) and P42 (Figure 5G, H). Notably, defects in the dimensions of stereocilia of utricle hair cells were also observed in Mrtfb cKO mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B).
Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all
Mrtfb cKO mice have defects in the cuticular plates.
(A) Reduced phalloidin staining in the cuticular plates of Mrtfb cKO HCs at P10. (B) Quantification of phalloidin reactivity in the cuticular plates of inner hair cells (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs) at P10. Analyzed numbers (cells, animals): IHCs, control (60, 6), Mrtfb cKO (63, 6). OHCs, control (261, 6), Mrtfb cKO (265, 6). (C) TRIOBP immunostaining of IHCs at P10. Side views of TRIOBP labeling in IHCs are on the right. (D) Quantification of length of row 1 IHC stereocilia rootlets (as shown by arrows in C). Analyzed numbers (stereocilia, cells, animals): control (52, 16, 4), Mrtfb cKO (63, 23, 4). (E) Imaris 3D reconstruction of phalloidin-labeled cuticular plates in control and Mrtfb cKO mice at P10. (F) Quantification of cuticular plate volume of control and Mrtfb cKO IHCs. Analyzed numbers (cells, animals): control (15, 4), Mrtfb cKO (15, 4). (G, H) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of cuticular plates of IHCs and OHCs in control and Mrtfb cKO at P10 and P26. In C, scale bar for the side-view represents 1 μm. In G and H, the scale bars represent 1 μm. Scale bars in other panels represent 5 μm. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), p values were derived from two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, ****p value<0.0001, and ***p value<0.001.
Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all
The defects of stereocilia dimensions in Mrtfb cKO mice.
(A) Phalloidin staining of inner hair cell (IHC) bundles at different ages. En face views (scale bar, 5 μm) are on the left, and side views (scale bar, 1 μm) are on the right. (B) Fluorescence-based quantification of row 1 IHC stereocilia length at different cochlear positions and ages. Analyzed numbers: middle IHCs, P5 control (41, 20, 6), P5 Mrtfb cKO (53, 23, 6), P10 control (80, 35, 6), P10 Mrtfb cKO (36, 18, 6), P26 control (73, 23, 5), P26 Mrtfb cKO (71, 24, 5). Basal IHCs, P5 control (65, 28, 6), P5 Mrtfb cKO (60, 25, 6), P10 control (83, 39, 6), P10 Mrtfb cKO (48, 22, 6), P26 control (74, 25, 5), P26 Mrtfb cKO (73, 24, 5). (C, D) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of outer hair cells (OHCs) and IHCs at P10. (E) SEM-based quantification of row 1 stereocilia length and width in basal HCs of control and Mrtfb cKO at P10. Analyzed numbers: lengths: IHCs, control (50, 20, 6), Mrtfb cKO (59, 20, 6). OHCs, control (127, 33, 6), Mrtfb cKO (132, 39, 6). Widths: IHCs, control (65, 22, 5), Mrtfb cKO (58, 22, 5). OHCs, control (135, 35, 5), Mrtfb cKO (118, 39, 5). (F, G) SEM of OHCs and IHCs at P42. (H) SEM-based quantification of row 1 stereocilia length and width in basal IHCs of control and Mrtfb cKO at P42. Analyzed numbers: lengths, control (42, 22, 6), Mrtfb cKO (63, 24, 6). Widths, control (86, 22, 6), Mrtfb cKO (92, 24, 6). Scale bars in C, D, F and G represent 5 μm. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), p values were derived from two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, ****p value<0.0001, and *p value<0.05.
Altered expression pattern of proteins required for stereocilia dimensions in Mrtfb cKO
Given that the localization and expression pattern of ESPN1, EPS8, and GNAI3 were affected in Srf cKO hair bundle, we further investigated the expression pattern of these proteins in Mrtfb cKO at P4, P10, and P15 during stereocilia development. As shown in Figure 6, an obvious decrease in the relative row 1 tip fluorescence signal intensity for ESPN1 was initially observed at P10 in the mutants. Compared to ESPN1, the obvious reduction of relative row 1 tip fluorescence signal intensity of EPS8 and GNAI3 appeared much later in Mrtfb cKO, around P15 (Figure 6A–F). The irregular labeling of ESPN1 and GNAI3 in different stereocilia of the same row were occasionally observed in Mrtfb cKO mice (Figure 6G–I). The distribution of these proteins between rows 1 and 2 stereocilia were not affected in Mrtfb cKO mice at P10 (Figure 6J–L). Additionally, The fluorescence signals of FSCN2 within the stereocilia shaft were dramatically reduced by 40% in Mrtfb cKO IHCs (Figure 6M, N).
Figure 6
Altered distribution of tip proteins and actin crosslinker in Mrtfb cKO mice.
(A–C) Immunofluorescence localization of ESPN1, EPS8, and GNAI3 in inner hair cells (IHCs) of control and Mrtfb cKO mice at different ages. Left panels are proteins staining separately from the phalloidin (in grayscale). (D–F) Quantitation of immunoreactivity of ESPN1, EPS8, and GNAI3 in IHCs of control and Mrtfb cKO at different ages. Analyzed numbers (stereocilia, cells, animals): ESPN1, P4 control (110, 11, 4), P4 Mrtfb cKO (110, 11, 4), P10 control (130, 13, 5), P10 Mrtfb cKO (140, 14, 5), P15 control (110, 11, 4), P15 Mrtfb cKO (120, 12, 4). EPS8, P4 control (120, 12, 5), P4 Mrtfb cKO (100, 10, 5), P10 control (190, 19, 5), P10 Mrtfb cKO (200, 20, 5), P15 control (110, 11, 5), P15 Mrtfb cKO (110, 11, 5). GNAI3, P4 control (120, 12, 5), P4 Mrtfb cKO (110, 11, 5) P10 control (100, 10, 4), P10 Mrtfb cKO (100, 10, 4), P15 control (100, 11, 4), P15 Mrtfb cKO (120, 11, 4). (G–I) Percentage of row 1 tip with ESPN1, EPS8, or GNAI3 staining to all row 1 stereocilia in IHCs of control and Mrtfb cKO at P10. (J–L) Percentage of IHCs with ESPN1, EPS8, or GNAI3 staining on the row 2 tips of control and Mrtfb cKO at P10. Analyzed numbers in G–L (cells, animals): ESPN1, control (24, 5), Mrtfb cKO (20, 5). EPS8, control (24, 5), Mrtfb cKO (24, 5). GNAI3, control (24, 4), Mrtfb cKO (21, 4). (M) FSCN2 immunostaining in control and Mrtfb cKO IHCs. (N) Quantification of FSCN2 reactivity in IHC stereocilium shafts at P10. Analyzed numbers (stereocilia, cells, animals): control (130, 13, 6), Mrtfb cKO (120, 12, 6). Scale bars, 5 μm. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), p values were derived from two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, ****p value<0.0001, ***p value<0.001, and **p value<0.01.
By comparing the expression level, the row-specific distribution and the irregular labeling of the tested proteins in Srf cKO and Mrtfb cKO hair cells, the results suggested that during stereocilia development, the effects of SRF and MRTFB on tip proteins’ localization patterns were fundamentally different, which were highly consistent with the severity of the morphological defects of stereocilia dimensions in Srf cKO and Mrtfb cKO hair cells.
Mrtfb deficiency causes early-onset hearing loss
The hearing function in mice lacking Mrtfb in hair cells was evaluated using ABR measurements. At P26, the ABR thresholds of Mrtfb cKO mice were significantly elevated, with more pronounced effects at mid- to high frequencies ranging from 11 to 32 kHz. By P40, Mrtfb cKO mice developed profound hearing loss at all frequencies tested, with ABR thresholds that were 40–60 dB higher than those of the control group (Figure 7A). To assess OHC functions, we further recorded DPOAEs. Consistent with ABRs measurements, DPOAE thresholds of Mrtfb cKO mice were markedly elevated over the 11–32 kHz frequency range. From P40 onward, the DPOAE thresholds increased progressively for all frequencies (Figure 7B). The amplitude and latency of ABR wave 1 at 11.3 kHz were also analyzed. In comparison to normal hearing control mice, the amplitude of ABR wave 1 was reduced at 80–90 dB, and the latency of ABR wave 1 was significantly prolonged (Figure 7C).
Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all
Early-onset and progressive hearing loss in Mrtfb cKO mice.
(A) Auditory brainstem response (ABR) analysis demonstrates Mrtfb cKO mice exhibited early-onset and progressive hearing loss. (B) Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) thresholds in Mrtfb cKO mice were significantly elevated at P26 and at P42 compared to control. (C) ABR wave1 amplitude (upper panel) and latency (lower panel) at 11.3 kHz in control and Mrtfb cKO mice at P26. Analyzed numbers (animals): P26, control (7), Mrtfb cKO (8). P42, control (8), Mrtfb cKO (7). Arrows indicate that at fixed frequency, no response was identified at the maximum output. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM), p values were derived from two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post-test. (D) Prestin immunostaining in outer hair cells (OHCs) at P18, side views of OHCs are on the right. (E) Nonlinear capacitance (NLC) recordings of OHCs in control and Mrtfb cKO mice at P18. (F–I) Quantitative analysis of Qmax, Clin, Qsp, and Vh showed no significant difference between control and Mrtfb cKO OHCs. Analyzed numbers (cells, animals): control (5, 4), Mrtfb cKO (5, 4). (J, K) CtBP2-Cav1.3 and CtBP2-GluR2 co-immunostaining in inner hair cells (IHCs). Higher magnification images are in the upper dotted box. (L) Comparison of IHC ribbon synapse numbers between control and Mrtfb cKO mice at different cochlear positions at P26. Analyzed numbers (cells, animals): apical turns, control (28, 5), Mrtfb cKO (28, 5). Middle turns, control (20, 6), Mrtfb cKO (26, 6). Basal turns, control (34, 6), Mrtfb cKO (32, 6). Scale bars in all panels represent 5 μm. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), p values were derived from two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. ****p-value <0.0001, ***p-value <0.001, **p-value <0.01, and *p-value <0.05.
In addition to the impairments of cuticular plate integrity and stereocilia dimensions, we sought to investigate the other potential factors contributing to the early-onset hearing loss observed in Mrtfb-deficient mice. Previous studies have shown that the actin cytoskeleton beneath the lateral plasma membrane of OHCs is necessary for maintaining membrane rigidity and regulating OHC electromotility (Brownell et al., 2001; Holley and Ashmore, 1990). Therefore, we examined whether Mrtfb is crucial for the development of OHC electromotility. Initially, we evaluated the expression level and localization of Prestin the motor protein essential for OHC electromotility, in Mrtfb mutants. Our results showed that the expression level and localization of Prestin were normal in Mrtfb mutants (Figure 7D). We then performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings at P18 to evaluate the functional changes of OHCs in the absence of Mrtfb. We quantified the nonlinear capacitance, total number of Prestin (Qmax), cell sizes (Clin), charge density (Qsp), and voltage sensitivity (Vh), and found no significant differences between Mrtfb cKO and control mice (Figure 7E–I). These findings suggest that Mrtfb is not required for the development of OHC electromotility during early postnatal stages.
A dense network of F-actin has been observed to surround the ribbon synapse of IHCs using phalloidin staining (Guillet et al., 2016; Vincent et al., 2015). We investigatedthe effect of Mrtfb on the cochlear ribbon synapse by analyzing the expression of CtBP2, presynaptic Cav1.3 and postsynaptic GluR2. The number of CtBP2-positive synapses in Mrtfb mutants was comparable to controls, and normal co-localization of CtBP2 and Cav1.3, as well as CtBP2 and GluR2, was observed (Figure 7J–L). The F-actin mesh network at the ribbon synapse is known to play a crucial role in the spatial localization of Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels and vesicle exocytosis in IHCs. Further investigation is necessary to examine the distance between CtBP2 and Cav1.3 and evaluate exocytosis in IHCs in the absence of Mrtfb.
To determine whether the hearing loss in Mrtfb cKO mice was caused by hair cell loss, we counted hair cell numbers using MYO7A immunoreactivity at P26 and P42. Our results indicated that hair cell numbers in Mrtfb cKO mice were nearly intact, except for a reduction in OHC numbers at the base of Mrtfb cKO cochleae at P42 (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A, B). This suggests that the early-onset hearing loss observed in Mrtfb mutants is not primarily caused by hair cell loss.
RNA-sequencing reveals the distinct profiles of genes regulated by Srf and Mrtfb in hair cells
Given that Mrtfb mutants exhibit a mild phenotype similar to the loss of Srf in actin-enriched structures such as the cuticular plate and hair bundles, we hypothesized that MRTFB–SRF axis regulates the actin-based cytoskeleton structures and function of hair cells. To investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the observed changes in hair bundle and cuticular plates in Srf and Mrtfb mutants, we performed RNA-sequencing of control and mutant hair cells. We utilized mice harboring Atoh1-Cre, Rosa26 with LSL-tdTomato reporter (also known as Ai9) and floxed Srf or Mrtfb alleles. At P2, cochleae were dissected and dissociated into single cells, and tdTomato-positive hair cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) based on tdTomato fluorescence intensity (Figure 8A). We performed differential gene expression analysis (padj < 0.05 and |log2(fold change)| > 1) (Figure 8B), and identified 110 up-regulated and 79 down-regulated DEGs in Srf cKO hair cells (the down-regulated genes hereinafter referred to as Srf targets), and 15 up-regulated and 105 down-regulated DEGs in Mrtfb cKO hair cells (the down-regulated genes hereinafter referred to as Mrtfb targets). To validate the RNA-Seq results, we selected ten Srf targets (Srf, Actb, Actg1, Cfl1, Actr3, Myo1e, Thbs2, Ush2a, Camp, and Htra4), eight Mrtfb targets (Srf, Actb, Actg1, Cfl1, Actr3, Kif14, Rsf1, and Alkbh8), and one unchanged gene Myo7a for RT-qPCR confirmation (Figure 8C, D). Using immunocytochemistry and RNAscope, we confirmed the reduction of CTGF (a Srf target), Pcdhb15 and Ctnna3 (Mrtfb targets) in hair cells consistent with RNA-Seq analysis results (Figure 8F–H). Interestingly, none of the down-regulated genes in Srf targets and Mrtfb targets were common, highly suggesting that in hair cells, Srf or Mrtfb may regulate the distinct profiles of genes that affect the development and function of the actin-based structures. To further confirm this hypothesis, we first quantified the relative expression level of known MRTF–SRF target genes (Actb, Actg1, Cfl1, and Actr3) that are essential for hair cell actin cytoskeleton (Esnault et al., 2014). Only Actb was reduced in Srf cKO hair cells, consistent with the immunoreactivity of ACTB (Figure 8C–E). We then summarized the relative expression level of all the reported target genes of MRTF–SRF axis with padj < 0.05 in our hair cell dataset (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A). The results showed that no genes were tightly coregulated by both Srf and Mrtfb in the context of hair cells.
Figure 8 with 1 supplement see all
Srf cKO and Mrtfb cKO hair cell transcriptome analysis.
(A) Diagram of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) purification strategy to isolate hair cells. The genotypes of mice used for cell sorting are on the right of the mouse cartoon. (B) The heatmaps of all the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Srf cKO and Mrtfb cKO (padj < 0.05 and |log2(fold change)| > 1). Color-coded key bar indicates normalized expression values, relatively high expression levels are indicated by red colors, whereas blue colors represent lower expression levels. (C, D) RT-qPCR validation of the expression levels of genes identified in control, Srf cKO and Mrtfb cKO RNA-Seq, normalized to GAPDH. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM), p values were derived from one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post-test, ****p value<0.0001, **p value<0.01, and *p value<0.05. (E, F) Reduced ACTB and CTGF immunostaining in Srf cKO HCs. Scale bars, 5 μm. (G, H) RNAscope in situ hybridizations analysis of Pcdhb15 and Ctnna3 expression in P2 frozen sections of cochleae from control and Mrtfb mutants. Nuclei were labeled with 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Scale bar, 20 μm. (I) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis (Biological Process) of down-regulated DEGs in Srf cKO and Mrtfb cKO. (J) Summary of functional clustering of down-regulated DEGs by Srf or Mrtfb deficiency, according to gene’s GO annotations in Gene Ontology Resource.
We next performed a Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of down-regulated DEGs related to biological processes to better understand the role of Srf and Mrtfb in hair cells. In Srf mutants, the GO analysis revealed significant enrichment in five biological processes: regulation of cell growth, cell growth, regulation of growth, defense response, and growth. The DEGs enriched in the growth-associated GO terms included Ctgf and Htra4, while Camp and Ngp were enriched in the defense response term (Figure 8I). On the other hand, in Mrtfb mutants, the GO analysis identified a significant enrichment of genes associated with adhesion-related terms, such as cell adhesion, biological adhesion, homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules, cell–cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules, and cell–cell adhesion. The DEGs enriched in these GO terms included Cdh19, Pcdhb7, Pcdhb12, Pcdhb15, and Ctnna3 (Figure 8I).
Although no significant enriched GO terms were found for cytoskeleton-related genes, a number of down-regulated DEGs were identified. We conducted a functional clustering analysis of down-regulated DEGs based on GO annotations to comprehensively summarize the cytoskeleton-related genes in Srf and Mrtfb targets. In Srf cKO, seven down-regulated DEGs were involved in cytoskeleton organization, including actin cytoskeleton organization, actin cytoskeleton reorganization, actin filament organization, and so on. For Mrtfb cKO, Ctnna3 was the only gene involved in cytoskeleton organization and its ancestor term, actin filament organization. Moreover, in terms of molecular function, five down-regulated DEGs in Srf cKO and seven down-regulated DEGs in Mrtfb cKO were associated with cytoskeletal protein binding, as well as a few of ancestor terms (Figure 8J).
Taken together, our hair cell transcriptome sequencing analysis revealed that Srf plays a vital role in activating genes involved in cell growth, defense response, and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, while Mrtfb functions independently of Srf and primarily directs gene expression in cell adhesions and regulation of actin cytoskeleton. These findings provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying hair cell development and maintenance.
AAV-mediated rescue of Cnn2 expression in vivo partially restores actin cytoskeleton dysfunction in Srf mutants
CNN2, an isoform of calponin proteins, which belong to a highly conserved family of actin-binding proteins, has been found in various cell types, such as smooth muscles, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, blood cells, and prostate cancer cells. In non-muscle cells, Cnn2 plays a role in actin-based cellular activities, like cell migration and cell adhesion. In prostate cancer cells, Cnn2 has been reported as an androgen-responsive Srf target gene that affects cell migration (Hossain et al., 2005; Liu and Jin, 2016; Takahashi et al., 1988; Takahashi et al., 1986). A motif matching SRF-binding CArG boxes has been identified 133 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site of Cnn2, and the binding of SRF to this site has been further confirmed by ChIP experiments (Verone et al., 2013). However, the functional significance of Cnn2 in actin-based hair cells remains unknown.
In our transcriptomic analysis of Srf cKO hair cells, we observed a significant reduction in Cnn2 expression (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A). RNAscope analysis revealed that Cnn2 expression was highly enriched in the spiral ganglion neuron, stria vascularis, and spiral ligament, whereas low-level expression was also detected in the organ of Corti (Figure 9—figure supplement 1A).Immunocytochemistry showed that CNN2 was localized to the tips of row 1 stereocilia in IHCs and OHCs (Figure 9A and Figure 9—figure supplement 1B, D), and additional immunoreactivity was observed in the cuticular plate (Figure 9B and Figure 9—figure supplement 1D). The antibody used here recognizes an epitope located within the C-terminal variable region, which constitutes the main differences among the CNN isoforms. In contrast to control, the relative row 1 tip signal intensity decreased significantly for CNN2 in P6 Srf cKO IHC stereocilia (Figure 9C). A slightly reduced signal was also observed in the cuticular plate of Srf cKO IHCs and OHCs (Figure 9B and Figure 9—figure supplement 1D). These results suggest a key role of Cnn2 downstream of Srf in the proper development of stereocilia and cuticular plate.
Figure 9 with 1 supplement see all
The injection of Anc80L65-Cnn2 partially restores the cuticular plate integrity and stereocilia morphology in Srf cKO mice.
(A, B) CNN2 immunostaining in the stereocilia and cuticular plates of P6 inner hair cells (IHCs). (C) Quantitation of CNN2 reactivity in row 1 IHC stereocilia. Analyzed numbers (stereocilia, cells, animals): control (100, 10, 4), Srf cKO (110, 11, 4). (D) Depiction of the experimental paradigm for in vivo virus injection. (E, F) CNN2 immunostainings in the stereocilia and cuticular plates of P11 control mice injected with Anc80L65-GFP or Anc80L65-Cnn2, and Srf cKO injected with Anc80L65-Cnn2.The bottom panels in E and all panels in F were taken at the level of the cuticular plate. The GFP expression in IHCs of Srf cKO injected with Anc80L65-Cnn2 indicate the efficiency of Cnn2 delivery. Arrowheads indicate CNN2 at row 2 stereocilia tips. (G) Phalloidin staining in the cuticular plates of Anc80L65-GFP-injected control, Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected control, Anc80L65-GFP-injected Srf cKO, and Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected Srf cKO hair cells at P11. (H) Quantification of phalloidin reactivity in the cuticular plates of P12 IHCs and outer hair cells (OHCs) from Anc80L65-GFP-injected control, Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected control, Anc80L65-GFP-injected Srf cKO, and Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected Srf cKO mice. Analyzed numbers (cells, animals): IHCs, Anc80L65-GFP-injected control (52, 5), Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected control (47, 5), Anc80L65-GFP-injected Srf cKO (49, 5), Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected Srf cKO (61, 6). OHCs, Anc80L65-GFP-injected control (194, 5), Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected control (147, 5), Anc80L65-GFP-injected Srf cKO (150, 5), Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected Srf cKO (204, 6). (I) Representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of P11 apical IHCs of Anc80L65-GFP-injected control, Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected control, Anc80L65-GFP-injected Srf cKO, and Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected Srf cKO. Arrowheads indicate abnormal thin stereocilia tips. (J) SEM-based quantification of row 1 stereocilia length and width of P11 apical IHCs. Analyzed numbers (stereocilia, cells, animals): lengths, Anc80L65-GFP-injected control (52, 16, 4), Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected control (44, 13, 5), Anc80L65-GFP-injected Srf cKO (70, 20, 5), Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected Srf cKO (99, 30, 6). Widths, Anc80L65-GFP-injected control (107, 20, 4), Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected control (75, 20, 5), Anc80L65-GFP-injected Srf cKO (121, 25, 5), Anc80L65-Cnn2-injected Srf cKO (130, 30, 6). In E, the scale bar for side-view represents 1 μm and scale bars in other panels represent 5 μm. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), p values were derived from two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, ****p value<0.0001, ***p value<0.001, and **p value<0.01.
We then investigated whether the delivery of Cnn2 using Anc80L65 in Srf cKO mice could rescue abnormal hair bundle and the cuticular plate structure. The Anc80L65 vector carrying the coding sequence of Cnn2 followed by GFP reporter was delivered directly into the scala media of the basal turn of the cochlea in P0–P1 mice (Figure 9D). The transduction efficiency of Anc80L65 was visualized by GFP fluorescence. As illustrated in Figure 9—figure supplement 1C, almost all IHCs were GFP positive, while the majority of OHCs were transduced efficiently. Immunostaining using antibody against CNN2 showed that Cnn2 delivered by Anc80L65 was highly expressed and specifically localized to the tips of row 1 stereocilia and the cuticular plate. Of note,transduced hair cell also showed row 2 stereocilia tip localization of CNN2 (Figure 9E, F and Figure 9—figure supplement 1E).
The relative F-actin intensity change of the cuticular plate was quantified and was found to be significantly increased in both IHCs and OHCs from Srf cKO mice injected with Anc80L65-Cnn2 compared to those injected with Anc80L65-GFP (Figure 9G, H). We also observed partial rescue of the length and width of row 1 stereocilia in IHCs (Figure 9I, J) and mild recovery of OHC stereocilia dimensions (Figure 9—figure supplement 1F, G). Notably, the control mice injected with Anc80L65-Cnn2 showed more F-actin intensity of the cuticular plate compared to the hair cells with Anc80L65-GFP (Figure 9G, H). Meanwhile, we observed slightly elongated and widened row 1 stereocilia in both control IHCs and OHCs with Anc80L65-Cnn2 (Figure 9I, J and Figure 9—figure supplement 1F, G), suggesting the role of Cnn2 in controlling stereocilia actin polymerization and the F-actin organization of the cuticular plate. As indicated by arrowheads in Figure 9I, the overexpression of CNN2 in control hair cells led to elongated but tapering stereocilia top, which may be caused by excessive expression of CNN2 along the upper part of the stereocilia (Figure 9E). Similarly, the row 3 and 4 IHC stereocilia seemed elongated in Srf cKO with Anc80L65-Cnn2 transduction, possibly due to ectopic overexpression of CNN2 in the cuticular plate and lower rows of hair bundle (Figure 9E, F). In conclusion, Cnn2, as a downstream target and an effector of Srf, regulates the development of stereocilia dimensions and F-actin network integrity of thecuticular plate in hair cells.
Discussion
The actin cytoskeleton has been recognized as a fundamental structure that plays a crucial role in normal hearing, and abnormal functioning of actin cytoskeleton-related proteins can cause hearing loss or deafness. However, the mechanisms of transcriptional controlling of actin cytoskeleton genes in hair cells are not yet well understood. The MRTF–SRF axis is a key signaling pathway that regulates the expression of genes participating in actin cytoskeleton activities, and has been studied extensively in a broad range of tissues and cell types. In this study, as illustrated in Figure 10, we investigated the importance of Srf and Mrtfs in hair cell actin-based structures by targeted inactivation of Srf, Mrtfa and Mrtfb, respectively. Our results showed that both Srf and Mrtfb are indispensable for the proper development of stereocilia dimensions, represented by the altered expression patterns of key stereocilia tip proteins in mutants, and maintaining the integrity of the cuticular plates. As expected, Srf and Mrtfb cKO hair cells exhibited a phenotypic similarity in reduced length and width of the stereocilia, and less dense F-actin network of the cuticular plate, suggesting a potential contribution of the MRTFBSRF axis to overlapping phenotypes. However, RNA-sequencing of hair cells and functional clustering analysis of down-regulated DEGs revealed unanticipatedly distinct profiles of genes regulated by Srf and Mrtfb, highly suggesting different transcriptional regulation mechanisms of actin cytoskeleton mediated by Srf and Mrtfb. Based on DEGs analysis, we further provided evidence suggesting the involvement of Cnn2, one of the Srf downstream targets, in regulating the hair bundle morphology and cuticular plate F-actin network organization. Notably, FACS-based RNA-sequencing is a powerful approach to resolve molecular differences in specific cell types between control and mutants, enabling the identification of functionally important genes for hair cells that have not been identified by genetics, such as actin cytoskeleton genes that express ubiquitously, but act essential roles in actin-based cytoskeleton structures of hair cells.
Figure 10
An illustration model of differential regulation of actin cytoskeleton mediated by SRF and MRTFB in hair cells.
Recently, emerging evidence suggests that MRTFs can also direct transcription of genes involved in multiple aspects of cell migration by cooperating with other transcription factors besides Srf. For example, the interaction between MRTFA and STAT3 promotes the migration of breast cancer cells (Liao et al., 2014; Xing et al., 2015), and the crosstalk of MRTF-YAP is required for cancer cell migration and metastasis (Kim et al., 2017). Additionally, Mrtfs can promote transcription of genes via its own SAP domain, as shown in Irem Gurbuz’s study that Mrtfa stimulates a breast cancer-specific set of genes involved in cell proliferation and cell motility (Gurbuz et al., 2014). Actin-binding proteins profilin isoforms Pfn1 and Pfn2 are also regulated by Mrtfs utilizing SAP domain-mediated transcriptional activity (Joy et al., 2017). In this study, hair cell-specific deletion of Mrtfb yielded a Srf-like phenotype outwardly, such as defects in the stereocilia dimensions and the cuticular plate integrity, but the lack of Srf or lack of Mrtfb had differential effects on hair cell transcriptome. These results highlight the complexity and context- specific regulation of actin cytoskeleton activities mediated by Srf and Mrtfs, and shed light on the potential of Mrtfb to regulate actin cytoskeleton in an Srf-independent manner. We summarized recent studies and screened the reported genes potentially regulated by Mrtfs in an Srf-independent mode (SAP, STAT3, or YAP dependent) in our hair cell RNA-sequencing dataset. Only Nox4 and Kif14 showed significantly differential expression in Mrtfb mutants (Figure 8—figure supplement 1B), and the reduction of Kif14 was also confirmed by RT-qPCR (Figure 8D). It is appealing to further investigate the mechanisms underlying Mrtfb-mediated regulation, as well as the interaction between Mrtfb and its transcription factors in the context of hair cell.
As previously noted, hair cells lacking Srf or Mrtfb displayed some common features such as decreased stereocilia length and width, and a less dense meshwork of F-actin forming the cuticular plate.However, the impairments were more severe in Srf-deficient hair cells compared to Mrtfb mutants, which showed significantly delayed microvillar regression and kinocilium degeneration. Analysis of DEGs revealed a reduction in Egr1, an immediate early gene and well-known transcriptional target of Srf, in Srf cKO hair cells. Various studies have established Egr1 as a regulator of hematopoietic cell differentiation and maturation (Kulkarni, 2022). Ctgf which was also significantly reduced in Srf cKO hair cells, was found to be enriched in cell growth-associated GO terms. Previous study showed that Mrtfa regulated microvessel growth via Ccn1 and maturation via Ctgf to mediate functional improvement of ischemic muscle tissue (Hinkel et al., 2014). These findings suggest that hair cell maturation may be affected by Srf deficiency, and delayed maturation may contribute to more severe defects in the actin cytoskeleton organization of stereocilia and cuticular plate, as well as microvillar regression and kinocilium degeneration.
In this study, an AAV vector containing wild-type Cnn2 cDNA was generated and injected into the cochleae of early postnatal Srf cKO mice. Immunofluorescence staining revealed a much stronger CNN2 signal, primarily restricted to the cuticular plate and the tips of stereocilia, unlike endogenous CNN2 expression in age-matched control mice injected with Anc80L65-GFP (Figure 9E, F). Upon Anc80L65-Cnn2 injection, the raised apical plasma membrane of cuticular plate was barely seen in Srf cKO mice (Figure 9—figure supplement 1F). In terms of F-actin intensity of the cuticular plate, Srf cKO hair cells appeared to be fully restored by Cnn2 delivery, with even stronger F-actin intensity compared to control. However, hair cell stereocilia dimensions defects were only partially restored.
The partial rescue of stereocilia dimensions observed upon AAV-mediated delivery of Cnn2 in Srf cKO mice could be attributed to several reasons. Firstly, immunofluorescence staining results indicated a transient expression pattern of CNN2 during stereocilia development. The CNN2 staining can be detected as early as P0, and it began to accumulate at row 1 tip, reaching a peak at P6, then decreased at P10. (Figure 9—figure supplement 1B). Alterations in CNN2 expression levels were also observed in the cuticular plate of P6 and P11 hair cells (Figure 9B, F), suggesting a critical window of gene delivery for successful recovery of stereocilia dimensions. Recent advances in utero gene transfer to the inner ears have been reported (Gubbels et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2016; Miwa et al., 2013), especially AAV-mediated prenatal gene transduction (Bedrosian et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2020), indicating the potential use of this approach to initiate the Cnn2 overexpression earlier during stereocilia development. Secondly, Cnn2 has been reported to regulate cell motility differently in various cell types and biological processes. For example, the macrophages of Cnn2 knockout mice showed faster migration than that of control mice (Huang et al., 2008). In Tang’s in vitro study, human umbilical vein endothelial cell migration was enhanced by Cnn2 overexpression and inhibited by Cnn2 knockdown (Tang et al., 2006). These discrepancies suggested that the precise level of Cnn2 expression required for maintaining actin cytoskeleton activities, such as cell migration, might also apply in hair bundle development and warrants further investigation. Thirdly, our differential gene expression analysis identified 79 down-regulated genes in Srf cKO hair cells, including Cnn2. Using the Gene Transcription Regulation Database (GTRD, v20.06), we extracted publicly available mouse ChIP-seq experiments information on Srf (Q9JM73), and screened the regions [−1000,+100] bp around the transcriptional start site of each gene on the list of 79 down-regulated Srf targets for Srf-binding sites (data not shown). Except for Cnn2, which had the most Srf-binding sites, several candidate target genes implicated in the regulation of actin cytoskeleton, such as Lsp1 and Zyxin, were also identified. The leukocyte-specific protein 1, Lsp1 is found in several cells types, such as neutrophils and endothelial (Li et al., 1995; Liu et al., 2005), and interacts with F-actin through villin headpiece-like sequence (Klein et al., 1990; Zhang et al., 2001). Further evidence suggests its function in regulating actin cytoskeleton remodeling (Maxeiner et al., 2015). The LIM-domain protein ZYXIN has been reported to regulate actin polymerization and play an important role in the organization of actin cytoskeleton. These findings suggest that the precise control of stereocilia dimensions and F-actin network integrity of cuticular plate might be governed by multiple candidate genes cooperatively (Fradelizi et al., 2001; Li et al., 2004).
It was surprising that late embryonic deletion of SRF, which is considered a master regulator of the actin cytoskeletal network (Miano et al., 2007), only mildly affected hair cell development. Instead, based on the observed rapid postnatal degeneration of the stereocilia and cuticular plate, it appears that SRF is equally or more important for the maintenance of the hair cell’s F-actin structures. We believe that this finding is important, as it will provide the foundation for future research on the role of SRF and its downstream components in the long-term maintenance of the hair bundle, with potential implications for progressive types of hearing loss.
Materials and methods
Animals
Experimental mice were housed with a 12:12hr light:dark cycle in standard laboratory cage in a temperature and humidity-controlled vivarium. Both male and female mice were used in all experiments. Srfflox/+ mouse was a gift from Dr. Eric Olson (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, USA), and Atoh1-Cre mouse line was kindly provided by Dr. Lin Gan (University of Rochester, USA). B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm9(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J (tdTomato) reporter mice (Stock No. 007909, C57BL/6J) were ordered from Jackson Laboratories. For Mrtfa and Mrtfb floxed lines (C57BL/6J), the target sequence was chosen using the CRISPR Design bioinformatics tool developed by Feng Zhang’s lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (https://zlab.squarespace.com/). The conditional Mrtfa allele contains two loxP sites flanking exon 3, and the target sequences used were: TCTAACCAAGCCGTTAGTCC, GCAGTCCAGTGGGGGCACTA. The exon 3 to exon 17 of Mrtfb was targeted and flanked by two loxP sites, and the target sequences used were: CCATGGGCTAAATTACACCG, CAGGTAAAGTATCATCCTAC. The floxing Mrtfa and Mrtfb lines were generated and obtained from GemPharmatech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China. Srffl/fl; Atoh1-Cre crosses were maintained in the C57BL/6J and 129S6 mixed background. Mrtfafl/fl; Atoh1-Cre and Mrtfbfl/fl; Atoh1-Cre were on a mixed background dominated by C57BL/6J (bred five generations to the C57BL/6J background). The genotypes used in this study are as follows: Srffl/fl (control), Srffl/fl; Atoh1-Cre (Srf cKO), Mrtfafl/fl (control), Mrtfafl/fl; Atoh1-Cre (Mrtfa cKO), Mrtfbfl/fl (control), Mrtfbfl/fl; Atoh1-Cre (Mrtfb cKO). Genotyping primers for all mutants are listed in Supplementary file 1.
Immunocytochemistry
Request a detailed protocolWhole inner ears were fixed for 30 min in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature. Adult cochleae were decalcified with 4.13% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) before dissection. After dissection, tissues were blocked for 1 hr with 1% bovine serum albumin, 3% normal donkey serum, and 0.2% saponin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; blocking buffer), and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies in blocking buffer. Tissues were then washed with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies (Alexa 488, Alexa 555, Alexa 647-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, donkey anti-mouse IgG, donkey anti-goat IgG, Invitrogen) and phalloidin-Alexa 488 (Invitrogen) in blocking buffer for 1–2 hr. Finally, organs were washed with PBS and mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). For immunostaining of ESPN1, EPS8, GNAI3, and FSCN2 proteins, tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15–20 min at room temperature. For measurements of stereocilia length visualized by phalloidin staining, tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 12–24 hr at 4°C. After dissection, tissues were permeabilized in blocking buffer for 1 hr at room temperature, and then incubated with phalloidin-Alexa 488 (Invitrogen) in blocking buffer for 3–4 hr at room temperature. Samples were imaged using Zeiss LSM880 and Leica SP8 confocal microscopes.
For the analysis of the phalloidin reactivity in the cuticular plates, hair cells containing upright hair bundles were used for statistics. summed Z-projections were made that included the whole cuticular plate. Regions of interest (ROIs) were selected using circles that encompassed the center area of the cuticular plate. ROIs were measured using ImageJ Fiji’s Measure function and measurements were also made outside the hair cells and sensory epithelium to determine the background. The phalloidin reactivity in one cuticular plate was (area) * (mean gray value), minus background signal. The phalloidin reactivity measurement method was described previously (Du et al., 2019). The measurement of cuticular plate volume was performed using Imaris version 9.9.0 (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) by manually selecting the area at the top of the cuticular plate where the phalloidin stain begins to appear until disappears at the bottom for 3D reconstruction.
For the analysis of the length of stereocilia, images containing upright hair bundles were selected for generating x–z reslices of stereocilia using ImageJ Fiji’s Reslice function. Reslices with views of central row 1 stereocilia in bundles were chosen. A vertical line from the top of a stereocilium to the point of insertion in the cuticular plate was drawn to measure a single stereocilium length. Stereocilia of HCs in the same region of the middle turn (20–24 kHz) and the basal turn (32–36 kHz) were measured.
For the analysis of the row 1 tip signal intensity of tip proteins, isolated Z-projections were made for row 1 tips and ROIs were selected at the top 1–2 μm of each tip using circles. ROIs covered most of each tip and 10 or more row 1 tips per hair bundle were measured using ImageJ Fiji’s Measure function. Measurements were also made outside the hair cells and sensory epithelium to determine the background. The tip signal intensity in a tip was (area) * (mean gray value) * (number of stacks used for the average projection), minus the total background signal. The tip signal intensity below the background was assigned a value of 0 for data calculation. For each protein staining, two to three images were acquired from 1 to 2 mice for each genotype at different ages per experiment, and experiments were repeated at least twice. Stereocilia length and tip signal intensity measurement methods have been reported previously (Krey et al., 2020).
The following antibodies were used in this study: rabbit anti-Myo7a (111501, Proteus BioSciences), rabbit anti-Srf (16821-1-AP, Proteintech), mouse anti-Lmo7 (B-7, sc-376807, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit anti-Triobp (16124-1-AP, Proteintech), mouse anti-Mrtfa (G-7, sc-398675, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-MKL2/Mrtfb (CL1546, MA5-24628, Thermo Fisher Scientific), mouse anti-Espn (611656, BD Biosciences), mouse anti-Eps8 (610143, BD Biosciences), rabbit anti-Gnai3 (G4040-1VL, Sigma-Aldrich), goat anti-Fscn2 (EB08002, Everest Biotech), rabbit anti-Prestin (EPR22715-53,ab242128, abcam), mouse anti-Ctbp2 (612044, BD Biosciences), mouse anti-glutamate receptor (556341, BD Biosciences), rabbit anti-Cav1.3 (ACC-005, Alomone Labs), mouse anti- Acetylated tubulin (T6793-100UL, Sigma-Aldrich), mouse anti-Ctgf (E-5, sc-365970, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-CD45 (AF114，R&D Systems), mouse anti-beta Actin (AC-15, ab6277, abcam), and rabbit anti-Cnn2 (21073-1-AP, Proteintech).
Scanning electron microscopy
Request a detailed protocolAdult mice were anesthetized and perfused intracardially with 2.5% glutaraldehyde + 2% paraformaldehyde. The cochleae were dissected and perfused through the round window with the fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde, in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, with 3 mM CaCl2). Cochleae were then incubated in fixative overnight at 4°C. For neonatal mice, the samples were dissected and treated with fixative immediately. The cochleae were decalcified with 4.13% EDTA for several days at room temperature, and then further dissected to expose the sensory epithelium. Samples were post-fixed according to the thiocarbohydrazide-osmium protocol (Davies and Forge, 1987). Briefly, samples were incubated in 1% OsO4 for 1 hr, washed in distilled water, and then incubated in 1% thiocarbohydrazide for 20 min. This incubation process was repeated twice followed by incubation again in 1% OsO4 for half an hour. Samples were then processed to dehydration with graded ethanol, critical-point dry and mounting on stubs. After sputter coating with platinum using Quorum Q150T ES, they were imaged on a Zeiss GeminiSEM 300 using the secondary electron detector. To determine the length of individual stereocilia in the highest row of a hair bundle, we obtained stereopairs scanning electron micrographs of the same hair bundle. The stereopairs of images were captured with 10° of tilt. The stereocilia length was quantified using previously described methods (Thiede et al., 2014; Vélez-Ortega et al., 2017). The widest part of a single stereocilium was measured as stereocilium width. Hair bundles of HCs in the basal turn (30–32 kHz) were selected for SEM imaging and data analysis.
Transmission electron microscopy
Request a detailed protocolAdult mice were anesthetized and perfused intracardially with 2.5% glutaraldehyde + 2% paraformaldehyde. The cochleae were dissected and perfused through the round window with the fixative. For neonatal mice, the samples were dissected and treated with fixative immediately. Cochleae were incubated in fixative overnight at 4°C and then decalcified in 4.13% EDTA pH 7.3 in 2% paraformaldehyde, for 1 week at room temperature. The cochleae were post-fixed in 1% OsO4–1.5% ferricyanide in 0.1 M PB, then stained with 4% uranyl acetate. The samples were dehydrated in graded series of ethanol, acetone oxime, and 100% Epoxy Embedding Medium (EPON). Samples were sectioned at 100 nm thickness onto 200 mesh copper grids and contrast stained with lead citrate and 4% uranyl acetate. Imaging was conducted using a Hitachi HT7800 transmission electron microscope.
Auditory brainstem response
Request a detailed protocolABRs were recorded at P26 and P42. The measurements were performed in a sound-attenuating chamber (Shanghai Shino Acoustic Equipment Co., Ltd). Animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of zoletil (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (20 mg/kg), and then kept on a heating pad (Homeothermic Monitoring System, Harvard Apparatus). ABRs were recorded by three subdermal needle electrodes. The active electrode was placed at the vertex of the skull, the reference electrode over the mastoid area of the right ear and the ground electrode on the shoulder of the left side. The free-field sound stimuli were delivered using a speaker (MF1, Tucker-Davis Technologies, Inc, Alachua, FL, USA) placed in front of the vertex of animal about 10 cm. Sound signals were generated by an acoustic stimulation system (Tucker-Davis Technologies), and data were acquired with the software BioSigRZ (Tucker-Davis Technologies). Responses were amplified ×5000 and filtered at 0.03–5 kHz, and thresholds were measured at 5.6, 8, 11.3, 16, 22.6, and 32 kHz. Stimulus intensity was decreased in 5 dB steps until two response waveforms could no longer be identified. Hearing threshold was defined as the lowest sound pressure level that elicited an appropriate ABR response.
Distortion product otoacoustic emissions
Request a detailed protocolDPOAE was recorded at P26 and P42. Mice were anesthetized and kept on a heating pad. Two EC1 electrostatic speakers driven by Tucker-Davis Technologies (TDT) RZ6 system through separate channels generated two stimulus frequencies (f1 and f2). The speakers were connected to the right ear of animals using a close-field component. DPOAE recordings were collected with constant f2 frequencies from 5 to 32 kHz, with f1 swept with the frequency ratio of f2/f1 constant at 1.2. The level of L1 was equal to L2. L2 was swept in 5 dB increments from 20 to 80 dB SPL for each frequency. The acoustic waveform was collected using BioSigRZ software. DPOAE threshold was defined as the L2 producing a DPOAE that exceeded the mean noise floor by at least 3 dB. For each frequency, the mean noise floor intensity was under 0 dB SPL.
Hair cell counts
Request a detailed protocolMice were killed after ABR and DPOAE tests at P26 and P42. Cochleae were harvested and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hr and decalcified for 2 days in EDTA solution. Apical, middle, and basal turns of the cochlear sensory epithelium were dissected. The presence of hair cells was labeled with MYO7A immunoreactivity. Confocal microscopy images were analyzed using ImageJ. Hair cells were counted in at least 200 μm widths of the apical turn (8–11 kHz), middle turn (20–24 kHz), and basal turn (32–34 kHz) in each cochlear sensory epithelium.
Whole-cell patch-clamp recording
Request a detailed protocolAll the patch-clamp experiments were performed at room temperature. The cochleae explants were dissected out from P18 mice. Individual first row OHCs were isolated from apical turns of the cochlea and bathed in extracellular solutions containing the following (in mM): 132 NaCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, and 10 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) (pH 7.2–7.3 with NaOH, osmolality 300 mOsm with D-glucose). The intracellular solution was the same as extracellular solution, except for the addition of 10 mM Ethylene-bis(oxyethylenenitrilo)tetraacetic acid (EGTA). The recording site corresponds to the 8–11 kHz region. For data collection, an axon 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) was used. Continuous high resolution (2.56 ms sampling) two-sine stimulus protocol (10 mV peak at both 390.6 and 781.2 Hz) superimposed onto a 300-ms voltage ramp (from+160 to −160 mV) was used for nonlinear capacitance measurement. Data were acquired and analyzed using jClamp (SciSoft Co., Ridgefield, CT; https://www.scisoftco.com/).
Capacitance data were fit to the first derivative of two-state Boltzmann function.
where
Qmax is the maximum nonlinear charge, Clin is linear membrane capacitance, VpkCm (Vh) is voltage at peak capacitance, Vm is membrane potential, z is valence, e is electron charge, k is Boltzmann’s constant, and T is absolute temperature.
Cochlear hair cell FACS
Request a detailed protocolCochlear sensory epithelia were dissected from Srffl/fl; Atoh1-Cre; tdTomato, Mrtfbfl/fl; Atoh1-Cre; tdTomato, and Atoh1-Cre; tdTomato mice at P2. 8–20 epithelia were collected for each group. The collected cochlear sensory epithelia were incubated for 20 min at 37°C in an enzymatic solution containing papain (LK003150, Worthington Biochemical Corp) and dissociated by triturating with a pipette. The digestion was stopped by the addition of ice-cold ovomucoid in bovine serum albumin solution. The dissociated cells were spun at 300 × g for 5 min. After removing the supernatant, cells were resuspended with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS). The cells were filtered through a cell strainer with 35 μm mesh to eliminate cell clumps and debris. The cells were then sorted on BD Influx cell sorter with a 100-μm nozzle (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) using the channel for tdTomato to collect positive cells into DPBS. Hair cells, which comprised 1.2–1.8% of viable cells from each batch, were collected using tdTomato fluorescence signal. Approximately 6 × 103 to 1 × 104 tdTomato-positive cells were collected for each sample collection. After capturing single hair cells, cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 300 × g in 4°C. The supernatant was removed as much as possible before freezing the cells at −80°C.
RNA-Seq
Request a detailed protocolTotal RNA was extracted from sorted hair cells using the RNAprep Pure Micro Kit (DP420, Tiangen Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized using SMARTer Ultra Low RNA Kit for Illumina Sequencing (634936, Takara Bio). The DNA libraries were constructed using TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit V2 for Illumina (TD503-02, Vazyme) following the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified by Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. RNA-Seq was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system. After sequencing, clean reads were aligned to the mouse GRCm39 genome using Hisat2 (v2.0.5). Gene-level read counts were calculated using FeatureCounts v1.5.0-p3. The read counts of genes were normalized data of the Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM). Differential expression analysis of genes was performed using the DESeq2 R package (1.20.0). The DEGs were determined by comparing Srf cKO to control, and Mrtfb cKO to control, respectively, with padj < 0.05 and |log2(fold change)| > 1. GO enrichment analysis of DEGs was implemented by the clusterProfiler R package, in which gene length bias was corrected. The total RNA extraction, library construction, and sequencing were completed by Novogene (Novogene Bioinformatics Technology, Beijing, China).
RT-qPCR
Request a detailed protocolThe cDNA of sorted tdTomato-positive hair cells was synthesized using PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time, RR047A, Takara Bio). Synthesized cDNA was subsequently mixed with qPCR primers and TB Green Premix Ex Taq (Tli RNase H Plus, RR420A, Takara Bio). Real-time PCR quantification was performed using Cobas z 480 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmBH). The threshold cycle (Ct) number for each sample was determined in triplicate, and the experiments were repeated with three individual sets of samples. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the ΔΔCt method, and Gapdh was used as reference gene. RT-qPCR was performed with paired primers listed in Supplementary file 1.
RNAscope
Request a detailed protocolCochlear samples from neonatal mice were fixed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hr at 4°C, washed in PBS, dehydrated using a sucrose gradient, and then embedded in O.C.T. Compound (4538, Sakura Finetek) for cryosectioning. Samples were sectioned at 12 µm thickness and mounted on SuperFrost Plus slides (Fisher). The slides were post-fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 15 min, soaked in a graded ethanol series, and subjected to RNAscope staining using the RNAscope 2.5HD Red Assay (322350, ACD) and RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Reagent Kit v2 (323100, ACD) according to the manufacturer’s standard protocol. The following RNAscope probes used in the experiment were designed by and ordered from ACD: mm-Ctnna3 (516621), mm-Pcdhb15 (544991), mm-Mrtfa (567821), mm-Mrtfb (404721), and mm-Cnn2 (1231301-C1).
AAV production
Request a detailed protocolAnc80L65-CMV-GFP and Anc80L65-CMV-mouse Cnn2-P2A-GFP were purchased from Vigene Biosciences (Shandong, China). The titers of Anc80L65-CMV-GFP and Anc80L65-CMV-mouse Cnn2-P2A-GFP were 4.7 × 1013 and 3.7 × 1013 genome copies/ml, respectively.
In vivo AAV gene delivery
Request a detailed protocolSrffl/+, Srffl/fl, and Srffl/fl; Atoh1-Cre pups were anesthetized by hypothermia on ice at P0–P1. A preauricular incision was made to expose the otic bulla. A total of 0.5 μl of each virus per cochlea were delivered into the scala media using a glass micropipette (WPI, Sarasota, FL) held by a Nanoliter 2000 micromanipulator (WPI). The injection site was the basal turn of the cochlea. The release speed was controlled by MICRO-2T microinjection controller (WPI) at 129 nl/min.
Statistical analysis
Request a detailed protocolStatistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (La Jolla, CA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni correction was used for RT-qPCR data, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test was used for ABR and DPOAE analyses, and two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was used for other comparisons between two groups. p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Asterisks in all figures indicated p values (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001). Error bars were plotted as standard deviation or standard error of the mean as indicated in figure legends. For each comparison, data were presentative of at least three biological replicates. Sample sizes for each figure were given in the figure legends.
Sample sizes were determined based on variance from previous experiments for ABRs, DPOAE, and whole-cell patch-clamp recording. For other experiments, sample sizes were estimated base on variance obtained from pilot experiments.
Data availability
The raw sequence data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (Chen et al., 2021) in National Genomics Data Center (Xue et al., 2022), China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GSA: CRA010747), publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA010747. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and Supplementary file 1.
-
Genome Sequence ArchiveID CRA010747. Srf Mrtfb hair cell RNA-seq.
References
-
Micro- and nanomechanics of the cochlear outer hair cellAnnual Review of Biomedical Engineering 3:169–194.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.169
-
The genome sequence archive family: toward explosive data growth and diverse data typesGenomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 19:578–583.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.001
-
Preparation of the mammalian organ of Corti for scanning electron microscopy*Journal of Microscopy 147:89–101.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02821.x
-
The structure of the cuticular plate, an in vivo actin gelThe Journal of Cell Biology 109:2853–2867.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.109.6.2853
-
Actin in hair cells and hearing lossHearing Research 288:89–99.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.003
-
RFX transcription factors are essential for hearing in miceNature Communications 6:8549.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9549
-
ActA and human zyxin harbour Arp2/3-independent actin-polymerization activityNature Cell Biology 3:699–707.https://doi.org/10.1038/35087009
-
Actin filaments regulate exocytosis at the hair cell ribbon synapseThe Journal of Neuroscience 36:649–654.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3379-15.2016
-
Serum response factor is essential for maintenance of podocyte structure and functionJournal of the American Society of Nephrology 29:416–422.https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2017050473
-
Spectrin, actin and the structure of the cortical lattice in mammalian cochlear outer hair cellsJournal of Cell Science 96:283–291.https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.96.2.283
-
H2-Calponin is regulated by mechanical tension and modifies the function of actin cytoskeletonThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 280:42442–42453.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509952200
-
Efficient in utero gene transfer to the mammalian inner ears by the synthetic adeno-associated viral vector Anc80L65Molecular Therapy. Methods & Clinical Development 18:493–500.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2020.06.019
-
Role of H2-calponin in regulating macrophage motility and phagocytosisThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:25887–25899.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M801163200
-
The myocardin-related transcription factor MKL co-regulates the cellular levels of two profilin isoformsJournal of Biological Chemistry 292:11777–11791.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.781104
-
Postnatal development of the hamster cochlea. II. Growth and differentiation of stereocilia bundlesJournal of Comparative Neurology 350:187–198.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903500204
-
MRTF potentiates TEAD ‐ YAP transcriptional activity causing metastasisThe EMBO Journal 36:520–535.https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201695137
-
The lymphocyte-specific protein LSP1 is associated with the cytoskeleton and co-caps with membrane IgMThe Journal of Immunology 145:2967–2973.https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.145.9.2967
-
Serum response factor controls neuronal circuit assembly in the hippocampusNature Neuroscience 9:195–204.https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1627
-
Early growth response factor 1 in aging hematopoietic stem cells and leukemiaFrontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 10:1–7.https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.925761
-
Zyxin interacts with the SH3 domains of the cytoskeletal proteins LIM-nebulette and Lasp-1Journal of Biological Chemistry 279:20401–20410.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M310304200
-
MRTF-A and STAT3 synergistically promote breast cancer cell migrationCellular Signalling 26:2370–2380.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.07.023
-
LSP1 is an endothelial gatekeeper of leukocyte transendothelial migrationThe Journal of Experimental Medicine 201:409–418.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20040830
-
Critical role of spectrin in hearing development and deafnessScience Advances 5:eaav7803.https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7803
-
Crucial role for the LSP1–myosin1e bimolecular complex in the regulation of Fcγ receptor–driven phagocytosisMolecular Biology of the Cell 26:1652–1664.https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-05-1005
-
Serum response factor: master regulator of the actin cytoskeleton and contractile apparatusAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 292:C70–C81.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00386.2006
-
Linking actin dynamics and gene transcription to drive cellular motile functionsNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 11:353–365.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2890
-
β-Actin and fascin-2 cooperate to maintain stereocilia lengthThe Journal of Neuroscience 33:8114–8121.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0238-13.2013
-
The cuticular plate: A riddle, wrapped in A mystery, inside A hair cellBirth Defects Research Part C 105:126–139.https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.21098
-
Actin’ together: serum response factor, its cofactors and the link to signal transductionTrends in Cell Biology 16:588–596.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2006.09.008
-
Balanced levels of Espin are critical for stereociliary growth and length maintenanceCell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 62:157–165.https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20094
-
Gene expression by mouse inner ear hair cells during developmentThe Journal of Neuroscience 35:6366–6380.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5126-14.2015
-
Isolation and characterization of a 34,000-dalton calmodulin- and F-actin-binding protein from chicken gizzard smooth muscleBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 141:20–26.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(86)80328-x
-
A critical role for calponin 2 in vascular developmentThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 281:6664–6672.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M506991200
-
Preliminary biochemical characterization of the stereocilia and cuticular plate of hair cells of the chick cochleaThe Journal of Cell Biology 109:1711–1723.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.109.4.1711
-
Actin filaments, stereocilia, and hair cells: how cells count and measureAnnual Review of Cell Biology 8:257–274.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.001353
Decision letter
-
Pascal MartinReviewing Editor; Institut Curie, France
-
Jonathan A CooperSenior Editor; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.
Decision letter after peer review:
Thank you for submitting your article "Differential regulation of hair cell actin cytoskeleton mediated by SRF and MRTFB" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Jonathan Cooper as the Senior Editor.
The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.
Essential revisions:
1. The authors are expected to provide a mechanistic interpretation of the effects of Srf and Mrtfb deficiencies on the actin cytoskeleton of the hair bundle and cuticular plate. Without a testable working hypothesis, the takeaway of the work for a better understanding of hair-bundle development and maintenance remains unclear.
2. The reviewers have both expressed some concerns about data analysis based on fluorescent staining and provided a number of suggestions. They ought to be all addressed with care in the revised manuscript.
3. Adding TEM data to discuss F-actin organization would be a strong asset, although we recognize those experiments may be difficult to perform within a few months.
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
This manuscript provides a lot of data of relatively high quality. Yet, my major question after reading it: "And what?" These transcription factors are expected to affect hair cell formation, anyway. In fact, the effect of their deletion is surprisingly minor, suggesting that they are not the major players in the regulation of the hair cell cytoskeleton. It would be interesting to find a mechanism that would explain exactly how Srf and Mrtfb contribute to the stereocilia formation. Obviously, it is hard to talk about a specific mechanism for a transcription factor that regulates hundreds of genes. Yet, the effects of Srf and Mrtfb on the distribution of essential proteins between the stereocilia rows in the same bundle seems to be fundamentally different (Figure 2 vs Figure 4). Perhaps, quantification of these between-the-row differences following Barr-Gillespie's group is a "low-hanging" fruit that may bring you to a mechanistic model.
More specific comments:
Line 112: Correct to "…became undetectable at P0 in hair cells but not in supporting cells".
Figure 1G,H-M: It would be helpful to make these panels self-explanatory by adding subtitles like "fluorescence-based" or "SEM-based" measurements. Also, clear labeling of the age of the cells on SEM images and quantification panels J and M would be helpful.
Figure 7: The whole Panel F is confusing since it does not show any stereocilia tip localization of CNN2. Likewise, the bottom images in panel E are also confusing. Please, correct the figure legend to state clearly that ALL images in panel F were taken at the level of the cuticular plate and the bottom images in panel E were also taken at the level below stereocilia.
Line 521: Please, describe the details of "thiocarbohydrazide-osmium protocol", many labs use different versions of this protocol.
Literature cited in the Methods section seems to be missing in the list of references.
Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):
Line 79. Change to "…severing protein gelsolin…"
Line 108. Maybe due to expression in the brain too.
Line 114. Figure 6 reference out of order.
Line 116. How was the cuticular plate phalloidin labeling done? Was the whole CP volume integrated or was an x-y slice used?
Line 118. What do you mean by "abnormal distribution"?
Line 119. In Figure 1 and other figures-some of the lettering is too small.
Line 129. I don't think "curly" is a particularly good descriptive word for this phenomenon.
Line 141. Please label J and M with age and location.
Line 151. Kinocilia is plural, so "kinocilium" is the proper word to use in this sentence.
Line 161. Remove "The" before ESPN1.
Line 192. Mostly reduced? This result suggests that the antibodies are not highly specific.
Line 198. What is the "Mrtfa group"?
Line 221. While statistically significant, the size of the change is probably not biologically significant.
Line 283. Display all genes examined in both Figure 6C and Figure 6D.
Line 287. Saying "…the MRTFB-SRF transcription axis may not exist…" is unclear.
Line 324. Change "…calponin proteins that belong…" to "…calponin proteins, which belong…"
Line 376. Why was it surprising that length and width changes were observed in Srf and Mrtfb cKOs? I thought that was what the hypothesis was.
Line 397. Change "…yielded Srf-like…" to "…yielded a Srf-like…"
Line 398. The phrase "…lack of Srf or Mrtfb solo…" is confusing.
[Editors’ note: further revisions were suggested prior to acceptance, as described below.]
Thank you for resubmitting your work entitled "Differential regulation of hair cell actin cytoskeleton mediated by SRF and MRTFB" for further consideration by eLife. Your revised article has been evaluated by Jonathan Cooper (Senior Editor) and a Reviewing Editor.
The manuscript has been improved but there are some remaining issues that need to be addressed, as outlined below:
After discussion, both reviewers have agreed that a quantification of stereocilia dimensions in wild-type mice injected with Anc80L65-Cnn2 should be added to the manuscript. Although the manuscript does not make this point very clear, the data suggest that the level of Cnn2 expression may control actin polymerization in the hair bundle: Cnn2 levels are reduced in Srf cKO mice and injection of Anc80L65-Cnn2 in these mice restores stereocilia morphology and integrity of the cuticular plate (Figure 9). Following this logic, one would expect that overexpression of Cnn2 in wildtype hair cells could also promote elongation and widening of the stereocilia and more actin in the cuticular plate (unless elongation is already saturated), reinforcing the conclusion that Cnn2 is indeed an effector of Srf. In any case, this quantification would help develop the mechanistic discussion about the putative role of Srf.
Note that the new Figure 10 does not appear to be referenced and discussed in the main text.
Although less critical, the 3D-reconstruction data of the cuticular plate in IHCs could be added to the manuscript.
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
This revised version of the manuscript has very welcome additions of a more thorough quantitative analysis of immunolabeling, new electron microscopy data, a better description of quantitative analysis, and a slightly revised discussion of the potential role of Srf and Mrtfb in the formation and/or maintenance of stereocilia bundles. The revision answered most of my previous comments, except for hypothetical molecular mechanisms of Srf and Mrtfb function, which may be hard to address. However, there is one essential issue that I've noticed after reading the revised manuscript.
The argument that CNN2 partially restores Srf cKO phenotype is based only on the comparison of the wildtype hair cells transfected with Anc80L65-GFP and the Srf cKO hair cells transfected with Anc80L65-GFP or Anc80L65-Cnn2 (Figure 9H,J and Suppl Figure 9G). What if an overexpression of Cnn2 forces stereocilia to grow even in the normal, wild-type hair cells? Then the observed stereocilia growth in Scf cKO mice after Anc80L65-Cnn2 transfection may be completely independent of Srf function. Therefore, the data analysis in Figure 9H,J and Suppl Figure 9G is missing one important control – wildtype hair cells transfected with Anc80L65-Cnn2. Based on a single image in Figure 9E, the authors did perform these experiments but, unfortunately, did not quantify stereocilia dimensions.
I also do not understand why a powerful quantification of the volume of cuticular plates with Imaris software was provided only in the letter to the reviewers but not included in the manuscript figures.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90155.sa1Author response
Essential revisions:
1. The authors are expected to provide a mechanistic interpretation of the effects of Srf and Mrtfb deficiencies on the actin cytoskeleton of the hair bundle and cuticular plate. Without a testable working hypothesis, the takeaway of the work for a better understanding of hair-bundle development and maintenance remains unclear.
2. The reviewers have both expressed some concerns about data analysis based on fluorescent staining and provided a number of suggestions. They ought to be all addressed with care in the revised manuscript.
3. Adding TEM data to discuss F-actin organization would be a strong asset, although we recognize those experiments may be difficult to perform within a few months.
We would like to thank the reviewers for the opportunity to address the issues raised in their comments. We have conducted additional experiments to address most of the concerns. In the revised manuscript, we have put more efforts on (1) interpreting the mechanistic understanding of the SRF and MRTFB in the hair cell (the revised Figures 3, 6 and 10), (2) describing the procedure of image quantification and analyses (the Materials and methods-Immunocytochemistry) and (3) conducting TEM analysis to examine directly the defects of F-actin organization of the cuticular plate in the mutants (the revised Figures 1 and 4). In the revised version, changes to our manuscript were all highlighted by using red colored text in the paper. Please find below a point-by-point address of the critique points.
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
This manuscript provides a lot of data of relatively high quality. Yet, my major question after reading it: "And what?" These transcription factors are expected to affect hair cell formation, anyway. In fact, the effect of their deletion is surprisingly minor, suggesting that they are not the major players in the regulation of the hair cell cytoskeleton. It would be interesting to find a mechanism that would explain exactly how Srf and Mrtfb contribute to the stereocilia formation. Obviously, it is hard to talk about a specific mechanism for a transcription factor that regulates hundreds of genes. Yet, the effects of Srf and Mrtfb on the distribution of essential proteins between the stereocilia rows in the same bundle seems to be fundamentally different (Figure 2 vs Figure 4). Perhaps, quantification of these between-the-row differences following Barr-Gillespie's group is a "low-hanging" fruit that may bring you to a mechanistic model.
As the reviewer mentioned, it is difficult to figure out which gene is the key player among hundreds of downstream targets of SRF or MRTFB. Our efforts in this revised manuscript focused on indepth comparisons of stereocilia tip proteins’ localization pattern among control, Srf cKO and Mrtfb cKO during stereocilia development. Following the reviewer’s suggestion, we performed ESPN1, EPS8 and GNAI3 staining on the control and the mutant’s hair cells at P4, P10 and P15. The expression level, the row-specific distribution and the irregular labeling of tip proteins were analyzed and plotted in the revised Figure 3 and Figure 6. The results indicated that during stereocilia development, the effects of SRF and MRTFB on tip proteins’ localization patterns were fundamentally different, which were highly consistent with the severity of the morphological defects of stereocilia dimensions in Srf cKO and Mrtfb cKO hair cells.
We summarized the functional consequences among the control, Srf cKO and Mrtfb cKO mice in revised Figure 10 as working model, including the localization pattern of tip proteins during stereocilia development, represented by EPS8, as well as the morphological defects of stereocilia dimensions and cuticular plate.
We agree with the reviewer’s surprise that late embryonic deletion of SRF, supposedly a master regulator of the actin cytoskeletal network, had such mild effects on the development of the hair cell, a cell type with uniquely prominent F-actin-based structures. Instead, our data suggests that SRF is more important for the maintenance of the hair cell’s F-actin structures, based on the rapid postnatal degeneration of the stereocilia and cuticular plate. We believe that this finding is important, as it will provide the foundation for future research on the role of SRF and its downstream components in the long-term maintenance of the hair bundle, with potential implications for understanding age-related hearing loss. We believe that this is a reasonable and meaningful extrapolation of our data, thus included a sentence elaborating on this notion at the end of the Discussion section.
More specific comments:
Line 112: Correct to "…became undetectable at P0 in hair cells but not in supporting cells".
This sentence has been corrected.
Figure 1G,H-M: It would be helpful to make these panels self-explanatory by adding subtitles like "fluorescence-based" or "SEM-based" measurements. Also, clear labeling of the age of the cells on SEM images and quantification panels J and M would be helpful.
Thanks for the suggestion. The subtitles and the labeling of ages have been modified in the revised Figure 2 and Figure 5.
Figure 7: The whole Panel F is confusing since it does not show any stereocilia tip localization of CNN2. Likewise, the bottom images in panel E are also confusing. Please, correct the figure legend to state clearly that ALL images in panel F were taken at the level of the cuticular plate and the bottom images in panel E were also taken at the level below stereocilia.
We agree with the reviewer. We have corrected the figure legend to state the images more clearly, please see the revised Figure 9 legend.
Line 521: Please, describe the details of "thiocarbohydrazide-osmium protocol", many labs use different versions of this protocol.
We have added more details of thiocarbohydrazide-osmium protocol in this section.
Literature cited in the Methods section seems to be missing in the list of references.
We have included the literature cited in the methods in the list of references.
Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):
Line 79. Change to "…severing protein gelsolin…"
Yes, we have changed the sentence as suggested.
Line 108. Maybe due to expression in the brain too.
Yes, we agree. As described in Siegfried Alberti’s study, the forebrain-specific deletion of Srf in mice causes severe abnormalities, including balance impairments, lack of interest in feeding and reduced body weight. Srf fl/fl; CamKIIa-iCre mice usually died around P20. We have made changes to the causes of the weak appearance of Srf cKO mice and added this paper below in the reference list.
Reference:
Alberti, S. et al. Neuronal migration in the murine rostral migratory stream requires serum response factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6148–6153 (2005).
Line 114. Figure 6 reference out of order.
This sentence now refers to Figure 1—figure supplement 1E.
Line 116. How was the cuticular plate phalloidin labeling done? Was the whole CP volume integrated or was an x-y slice used?
In Figures 1A and 1B, the quantification of phalloidin intensity was processed using ImageJ. We first flattened these images to 2-D images by applying maximum intensity projection along the zaxis of the whole cuticular plate, then circled the area of the cuticular plate labeled with phalloidin and quantified the intensity. We have added more detail on the quantification of the cuticular plate phalloidin intensity to the “Materials and methods- Immunocytochemistry” section.
Line 118. What do you mean by "abnormal distribution"?
We have changed this sentence to “displayed a more punctate distribution in the cuticular plate”.
Line 119. In Figure 1 and other figures-some of the lettering is too small.
We have gone through all the figures and made appropriate changes to the size of the lettering.
Line 129. I don't think "curly" is a particularly good descriptive word for this phenomenon.
We have changed the sentence to “The deformation of the overlying plasma membrane above the cuticular plate of OHCs were also revealed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in mutants”.
Line 141. Please label J and M with age and location.
Yes, we have added age and location to the revised Figure 2 and Figure 5.
Line 151. Kinocilia is plural, so "kinocilium" is the proper word to use in this sentence.
We have corrected it to “kinocilium”.
Line 161. Remove "The" before ESPN1.
We have removed “The”.
Line 192. Mostly reduced? This result suggests that the antibodies are not highly specific.
Yes, we agree with the reviewer. We have tried a few other commercial MRTFA and MRTFB antibodies, but none of them showed good specificity in the cochlea. We have decided to change the word “mostly” to “partially” to make the conclusion more accurate.
Line 198. What is the "Mrtfa group"?
We have changed the “Mrtfa group” to “Mrtfa cKO mice”.
Line 221. While statistically significant, the size of the change is probably not biologically significant.
Yes, we agree. After performing ESPN1, EPS8 and GNAI3 staining at different ages during stereocilia development, the results overall suggested that the biologically significant reduction of relative row 1 tip fluorescence signal of EPS8 and GNAI3 appeared in Mrtfb cKO at P15.
Line 283. Display all genes examined in both Figure 6C and Figure 6D.
Yes, we have included all the genes examined by RT-qPCR in the revised Figures 8C and 8D in this sentence.
Line 287. Saying "…the MRTFB-SRF transcription axis may not exist…" is unclear.
Yes, we agree. We have deleted this sentence and made a few changes as follows “none of the down-regulated genes in Srf targets and Mrtfb targets were common, highly suggesting that in hair cells, SRF or MRTFB may regulate the distinct profiles of genes that affect the development and function of the actin-based structures.”
Line 324. Change "…calponin proteins that belong…" to "…calponin proteins, which belong…"
We have corrected it.
Line 376. Why was it surprising that length and width changes were observed in Srf and Mrtfb cKOs? I thought that was what the hypothesis was.
Yes, we agree with the reviewer. We have made appropriate changes to this sentence.
Line 397. Change "…yielded Srf-like…" to "…yielded a Srf-like…"
We have changed “Srf-like” to “a Srf-like”.
Line 398. The phrase "…lack of Srf or Mrtfb solo…" is confusing.
Yes, we agree with the reviewer. We have made appropriate changes to this sentence.
[Editors’ note: what follows is the authors’ response to the second round of review.]
The manuscript has been improved but there are some remaining issues that need to be addressed, as outlined below:
After discussion, both reviewers have agreed that a quantification of stereocilia dimensions in wild-type mice injected with Anc80L65-Cnn2 should be added to the manuscript. Although the manuscript does not make this point very clear, the data suggest that the level of Cnn2 expression may control actin polymerization in the hair bundle: Cnn2 levels are reduced in Srf cKO mice and injection of Anc80L65-Cnn2 in these mice restores stereocilia morphology and integrity of the cuticular plate (Figure 9). Following this logic, one would expect that overexpression of Cnn2 in wildtype hair cells could also promote elongation and widening of the stereocilia and more actin in the cuticular plate (unless elongation is already saturated), reinforcing the conclusion that Cnn2 is indeed an effector of Srf. In any case, this quantification would help develop the mechanistic discussion about the putative role of Srf.
Yes, we agree that the quantitative analysis of stereocilia morphology and integrity of the cuticular plate in the control mice injected with Anc80L65-Cnn2 is essential and helpful for understanding the role of Srf and Cnn2. The quantifications and representative images were showed in this new revised Figure 9G-J and Figure 9—figure supplement 1F,G.
Note that the new Figure 10 does not appear to be referenced and discussed in the main text.
We apologize for not mentioning the Figure 10 in the paper. Now the revised Figure 10 has been referenced and discussed in the first paragraph of the Discussion section.
Although less critical, the 3D-reconstruction data of the cuticular plate in IHCs could be added to the manuscript.
We have added the 3D-reconstruction data of the cuticular plate in IHCs in this new revised Figure 1F,G and Figure 4E,F.
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
This revised version of the manuscript has very welcome additions of a more thorough quantitative analysis of immunolabeling, new electron microscopy data, a better description of quantitative analysis, and a slightly revised discussion of the potential role of Srf and Mrtfb in the formation and/or maintenance of stereocilia bundles. The revision answered most of my previous comments, except for hypothetical molecular mechanisms of Srf and Mrtfb function, which may be hard to address. However, there is one essential issue that I've noticed after reading the revised manuscript.
The argument that CNN2 partially restores Srf cKO phenotype is based only on the comparison of the wildtype hair cells transfected with Anc80L65-GFP and the Srf cKO hair cells transfected with Anc80L65-GFP or Anc80L65-Cnn2 (Figure 9H,J and Suppl Figure 9G). What if an overexpression of Cnn2 forces stereocilia to grow even in the normal, wild-type hair cells? Then the observed stereocilia growth in Scf cKO mice after Anc80L65-Cnn2 transfection may be completely independent of Srf function. Therefore, the data analysis in Figure 9H,J and Suppl Figure 9G is missing one important control – wildtype hair cells transfected with Anc80L65-Cnn2. Based on a single image in Figure 9E, the authors did perform these experiments but, unfortunately, did not quantify stereocilia dimensions.
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion. Now we have added the quantifications, including the relative F-actin intensity change of the cuticular plate, row 1 stereocilia length and width of hair cells, and representative images in the new revised Figure 9G-J and Figure 9—figure supplement 1F,G. The quantification results suggested that Cnn2 may function in regulating stereocilia actin polymerization and the F-actin organization of the cuticular plate and the precise expression level of Cnn2 controlled by Srf is essential for the shaping of stereocilia architecture.
Based on these above results, we agree with the reviewer, and we couldn’t exclude the possibility that “the observed stereocilia growth in Scf cKO mice after Anc80L65-Cnn2 transfection may be completely independent of Srf function”. Further investigation is necessary to validate the direct transcription factor (Srf)-target gene (Cnn2) binding in isolated hair cells using tests like ChIP-PCR, which we were not able to finish in this revised version due to time constraints.
I also do not understand why a powerful quantification of the volume of cuticular plates with Imaris software was provided only in the letter to the reviewers but not included in the manuscript figures.
We have added the 3D-reconstruction analysis data of the cuticular plate volume using Imaris in this new revised Figure 1F,G and Figure 4E,F.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90155.sa2Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82000975)
- Ting-Ting Du
School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (JYZZ057)
- Ting-Ting Du
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300)
- Hao Wu
Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (21JC1404000)
- Hao Wu
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970872)
- Hao Wu
The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (82000975), and the Fundamental Research Program Funding of Ninth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (JYZZ057) to TTD; and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (21JC1404000), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (81970872) to HW.
Ethics
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Ninth People's Hospital (Shanghai, China) (SH9H-2020-A682-1). All animal maintenance and experimental procedures were performed by the recommendations in the Guide for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Senior Editor
- Jonathan A Cooper, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
Reviewing Editor
- Pascal Martin, Institut Curie, France
Version history
- Received: June 13, 2023
- Preprint posted: June 26, 2023 (view preprint)
- Accepted: November 17, 2023
- Accepted Manuscript published: November 20, 2023 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: December 7, 2023 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2023, Zhou et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 167
- Page views
-
- 54
- Downloads
-
- 0
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Differential regulation of hair cell actin cytoskeleton mediated by SRF and MRTFB
eLife 12:e90155.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90155
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
Activating mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) cause Parkinson’s disease. LRRK2 phosphorylates a subset of Rab GTPases, particularly Rab10 and Rab8A, and we showed previously that these phosphoRabs play an important role in LRRK2 membrane recruitment and activation (Vides et al., 2022). To learn more about LRRK2 pathway regulation, we carried out an unbiased, CRISPR-based genome-wide screen to identify modifiers of cellular phosphoRab10 levels. A flow cytometry assay was developed to detect changes in phosphoRab10 levels in pools of mouse NIH-3T3 cells harboring unique CRISPR guide sequences. Multiple negative and positive regulators were identified; surprisingly, knockout of the Rab12 gene was especially effective in decreasing phosphoRab10 levels in multiple cell types and knockout mouse tissues. Rab-driven increases in phosphoRab10 were specific for Rab12, LRRK2-dependent and PPM1H phosphatase-reversible, and did not require Rab12 phosphorylation; they were seen with wild type and pathogenic G2019S and R1441C LRRK2. As expected for a protein that regulates LRRK2 activity, Rab12 also influenced primary cilia formation. AlphaFold modeling revealed a novel Rab12 binding site in the LRRK2 Armadillo domain, and we show that residues predicted to be essential for Rab12 interaction at this site influence phosphoRab10 and phosphoRab12 levels in a manner distinct from Rab29 activation of LRRK2. Our data show that Rab12 binding to a new site in the LRRK2 Armadillo domain activates LRRK2 kinase for Rab phosphorylation and could serve as a new therapeutic target for a novel class of LRRK2 inhibitors that do not target the kinase domain.
-
- Cell Biology
Cells are exposed to a wide variety of internal and external stresses. Although many studies have focused on cellular responses to acute and severe stresses, little is known about how cellular systems adapt to sublethal chronic stresses. Using mammalian cells in culture, we discovered that they adapt to chronic mild stresses of up to two weeks, notably proteotoxic stresses such as heat, by increasing their size and translation, thereby scaling the amount of total protein. These adaptations render them more resilient to persistent and subsequent stresses. We demonstrate that Hsf1, well known for its role in acute stress responses, is required for the cell size increase, and that the molecular chaperone Hsp90 is essential for coupling the cell size increase to augmented translation. We term this translational reprogramming the ‘rewiring stress response’, and propose that this protective process of chronic stress adaptation contributes to the increase in size as cells get older, and that its failure promotes aging.
